Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Focus on Microsoft
Re: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] Aug 30 2003 08:49AM
fala83@libero.it (fala83 libero it) (5 replies)
Wasn't someone looking for a Group Policy collection tool? Oct 04 2003 02:48AM
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] (sbradcpa pacbell net)
Re: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] Sep 02 2003 12:42PM
simonis (simonis myself com) (1 replies)
RE: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] Sep 02 2003 08:46PM
Kim Oppalfens (kimoppalfens tiscali be) (1 replies)
RE: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] Sep 04 2003 12:08AM
Paulo Wilbert (pwilbert uninet com br)
cached passwords (was RE: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]) Sep 02 2003 06:28AM
Zachary Mutrux (zmutrux compumentor org)
Re: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] Sep 02 2003 01:11AM
Sam Baskinger (sam reefedge com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just as a side note, local password caching need never be to a local file on a
disk. If the operating system supports "pinning" memory pages (as WinNT and
after all do) then a password may be put into a pinned page. The password
may then be read from that page via some method of ipc.

The benefits of this is that a pinned page is never swapped out of memory so
an attacker cannot remove the HD and check the swap space. The password is
lost when the process owning that page dies (or the computer is forcibly
powered off).

Note that for the user to not need to enter a passphrase for every Kerberose
ticket issued Kerberose must use some sort of credential caching.

I am fairly sure (though not 100%) that Windows does not cache in local files
any sort of network security credentials.

Hope this is helpful!

Sam

On Saturday 30 August 2003 04:49, fala83 (at) libero (dot) it [email concealed] wrote:
> In my opinion a system wouldn'n cache password locally.
> E.g. Sysadmin logs in into a workstation and password will be stored
> locally. An attacker could retrieve his password and login into the whole
> network whit administrative privileges. It is not completely safe.
> I'd rather prefer use Kerberos, using his tickets to access network
> resource without caching password.
> Anyway if the password must be stored locally, it must be!
>
> >Todd Shubert wrote:
> >
> > What exactly is the "right security policy"? Wouldn't not storing the
> > password provide problems for users, specifically laptop users, that
> > require the use of cached credentials?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> KaVaDo provides the first and only integrated Web application scanner and
> firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, the most
> common form of online exploitation. Download a FREE whitepaper on Security
> Policy Automation for Web Applications.
> http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/KaVaDo_focus-ms_030818
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/U+46uabcSIn58XwRAr07AKDOAisF5Qi4P44w28pW6L0GXKRIDQCfX3Ao
s+h3neeLY5uuZ5LOmaQsM7w=
=g3bc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
KaVaDo provides the first and only integrated Web application scanner and
firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, the most
common form of online exploitation. Download a FREE whitepaper on Security Policy Automation for Web Applications.
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/KaVaDo_focus-ms_030818
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

[ reply ]
Re: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] Sep 01 2003 08:23PM
Flávio Pereira (fpereirabr yahoo com br)







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus