Can the terms "Microsoft Remote Desktop" and "Secure" even be used in
the same discussion? =)
The only way I could see applying any form of security is to do it
under the protection of a VPN. As for not having the active user
logged off, I don't have an answer for that.
Personally, I'd recommend one of the many other remote desktop tools
out there. WinVNC and Radmin both come to midn quickly. (WinVNC can be
done through SSH. Though I'm not positive, I believe you can encrypt
Radmin sessions as well.) Google both for more info.
--
Peace. ~G
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:58:49 -0400, Paul Aviles <paviles (at) adjoined (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Has anyone implemented Microsoft Remote Desktop in a secure and
> efficient way? Is there a way to overcome having the host computer
> logoff the current active user? Without that this program is pretty much
> useless.
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
>
the same discussion? =)
The only way I could see applying any form of security is to do it
under the protection of a VPN. As for not having the active user
logged off, I don't have an answer for that.
Personally, I'd recommend one of the many other remote desktop tools
out there. WinVNC and Radmin both come to midn quickly. (WinVNC can be
done through SSH. Though I'm not positive, I believe you can encrypt
Radmin sessions as well.) Google both for more info.
--
Peace. ~G
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:58:49 -0400, Paul Aviles <paviles (at) adjoined (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Has anyone implemented Microsoft Remote Desktop in a secure and
> efficient way? Is there a way to overcome having the host computer
> logoff the current active user? Without that this program is pretty much
> useless.
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
[ reply ]