Threat level definition
Search:
Home
Bugtraq
Vulnerabilities
Mailing Lists
Jobs
Tools
Beta Programs
News
Infocus
Foundations
Microsoft
Unix
IDS
Incidents
Virus
Pen-Test
Firewalls
Columnists
Mailing Lists
Newsletters
Bugtraq
Focus on IDS
Focus on Linux
Focus on Microsoft
Forensics
Pen-test
Security Basics
Vuln Dev
Vulnerabilities
Jobs
Job Opportunities
Resumes
Job Seekers
Employers
Tools
RSS
News
Vulns
Security Research
Focus on Microsoft
Back to list
|
Post reply
DACLS for software distribution points...
Jul 06 2006 01:01AM
Murad Talukdar (talukdar_m subway com)
(1 replies)
Hi all,
MS says in this article that the DACLS for software distribution points
should be EVERYONE: READ and Administrator: Full Control, Change, Read.
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/45a873dd-660d-4de
6-aa
c4-8a03974796121033.mspx?mfr=true
Why shouldn't the EVERYONE be removed and replaced with Authenticated Users?
I was thinking of doing this and can't really see any adverse impact.
Kind Regards
Murad Talukdar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
[ reply ]
Re: DACLS for software distribution points...
Jul 07 2006 12:37AM
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] (sbradcpa pacbell net)
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus
MS says in this article that the DACLS for software distribution points
should be EVERYONE: READ and Administrator: Full Control, Change, Read.
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/45a873dd-660d-4de
6-aa
c4-8a03974796121033.mspx?mfr=true
Why shouldn't the EVERYONE be removed and replaced with Authenticated Users?
I was thinking of doing this and can't really see any adverse impact.
Kind Regards
Murad Talukdar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
[ reply ]