|
Focus on Microsoft
default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 12 2008 02:45AM Murda Mcloud (murdamcloud bigpond com) (5 replies) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 12 2008 05:40PM David LeBlanc (dleblanc mindspring com) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 12 2008 04:38PM Kurt Dillard (kurtdillard msn com) (1 replies) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 12 2008 04:27PM James D. Stallard (james leafgrove com) (1 replies) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 12 2008 07:33PM Kurt Dillard (kurtdillard msn com) (1 replies) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 13 2008 08:43AM James D. Stallard (james leafgrove com) (1 replies) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 13 2008 04:25PM Kurt Dillard (kurtdillard msn com) RE: default for requiring authentication 2003 Jun 12 2008 04:14PM Cawthray, Stewart (stewart cawthray td com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
that I doubted myself.
Kurt wrote;
>>Your nemesis is thinking of older versions of Windows.
Bwahaha! Moriarty is foiled again...through the deductive powers of the
security focus list...
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]]
> >On Behalf Of Kurt Dillard
> >Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:39 AM
> >To: 'Murda Mcloud'; focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> >Subject: RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
> >
> >Murda,
> >You are correct, in Windows XP, 2003, and later the Everyone group only
> >includes Authenticated Users, it no longer includes Anonymous Users. You
> >can
> >change this but Microsoft strongly recommends against doing so. Your
> >nemesis
> >is thinking of older versions of Windows.
> >
> >Kurt
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]]
> >On
> >Behalf Of Murda Mcloud
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:45 PM
> >To: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> >Subject: default for requiring authentication 2003
> >
> >
> >I'm having a debate with someone over whether a 2003 server by default
> >(OOB)forces someone to authenticate(whether to a DC or to the server
> >itself
> >if standalone) before allowing access to files.
> >
> >
> >
> >He seems to think that the default is that no authentication is required
> >and
> >consequently anyone could rock up and connect a laptop to a network with
> >that server on it and get access to files on it-as the EVERYONE group is
> >given read permissions to new folders etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >I say he is wrong but am looking hard to find something to back me up.
> >
> >I understand that the guest account could access files as it is part of
> >the
> >EVERYONE group but it's disabled by default-but still, there is an
> >authentication process for guest to login
> >
> >
[ reply ]