Focus on Microsoft
Back to list
|
Post reply
RE: Windows Server Roles
Mar 01 2011 01:45AM
wt521125 (wt521125 yahoo com cn)
(1 replies)
Re: Windows Server Roles
Mar 01 2011 07:08AM
Mark Holmes (mark holmes nuffield ox ac uk)
Alberto,
Terminal services shouldn't be run on a DC, but DHCP is fine (it's supported by MS)
Read
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816592 if your going to be allowing dynamic updates.
HTH,
Mark
On 1 Mar 2011, at 05:20, "wt521125" <wt521125 (at) yahoo.com (dot) cn [email concealed]> wrote:
> Hi all and thanks for your replys.
> Mr. Koch, we'll use Windows server 2003 for new VM's.
> We are planning to replace the W2K Domain Controller and convert the Windows
> 2003 to primary domain controller and virtualize a second domain controller
> using Windows 2003 too and raise the domain functional level to 2003.
>
> Regards,
> Alberto Medina
>
> From: Steven J. Koch [mailto:steve.koch (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: Alberto Medina
> Cc: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Subject: Re: Windows Server Roles
>
> Alberto,
>
> What version of Windows will you be using for the new virtual servers?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Steven J. Koch
> Systems Development Engineer
>
> steve.koch (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Alberto Medina <amedinaj (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm planning in migrating some servers to VM's for separate some roles and
> for and replace some old servers. Currently we have 2 domain controllers,
> one on Windows 2000 and other in Windows 2003. Windows 2000 is the primary
> domain controller and W2K3 is Domain Controller, Terminal Services, and DHCP
> (and of course DNS for AD), and I want add VPN server for remote access. I
> have found that is not recommended to run DHCP or Terminal services in a
> Domain controller, so I want separate those roles to VM's but I want to
> know which of this roles can I run together in a VM without affecting
> security.
>
> Please let me know your opinions about this.
>
> Thank you and Best Regards,
> Alberto Medina
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> ¸Ã¿ìÃ?¢²áÃ?Ã?»¢³¬´óÃ?ÃÿÃ?â·Ã?Ã?Ã?Ãä?
> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
[ reply ]
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus
Terminal services shouldn't be run on a DC, but DHCP is fine (it's supported by MS)
Read
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816592 if your going to be allowing dynamic updates.
HTH,
Mark
On 1 Mar 2011, at 05:20, "wt521125" <wt521125 (at) yahoo.com (dot) cn [email concealed]> wrote:
> Hi all and thanks for your replys.
> Mr. Koch, we'll use Windows server 2003 for new VM's.
> We are planning to replace the W2K Domain Controller and convert the Windows
> 2003 to primary domain controller and virtualize a second domain controller
> using Windows 2003 too and raise the domain functional level to 2003.
>
> Regards,
> Alberto Medina
>
> From: Steven J. Koch [mailto:steve.koch (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: Alberto Medina
> Cc: focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Subject: Re: Windows Server Roles
>
> Alberto,
>
> What version of Windows will you be using for the new virtual servers?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Steven J. Koch
> Systems Development Engineer
>
> steve.koch (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Alberto Medina <amedinaj (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm planning in migrating some servers to VM's for separate some roles and
> for and replace some old servers. Currently we have 2 domain controllers,
> one on Windows 2000 and other in Windows 2003. Windows 2000 is the primary
> domain controller and W2K3 is Domain Controller, Terminal Services, and DHCP
> (and of course DNS for AD), and I want add VPN server for remote access. I
> have found that is not recommended to run DHCP or Terminal services in a
> Domain controller, so I want separate those roles to VM's but I want to
> know which of this roles can I run together in a VM without affecting
> security.
>
> Please let me know your opinions about this.
>
> Thank you and Best Regards,
> Alberto Medina
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> ¸Ã¿ìÃ?¢²áÃ?Ã?»¢³¬´óÃ?ÃÿÃ?â·Ã?Ã?Ã?Ãä?
> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
[ reply ]