SecurityFocus

performance of libnet-based tools Feb 26 2005 07:07AM
Steven Alexander Jr. (alexander steven sbcglobal net) (4 replies)

Re: performance of libnet-based tools Mar 01 2005 09:29PM
Aaron Turner (aturner pobox com)

Re: performance of libnet-based tools Mar 01 2005 08:55PM
Mark Atkinson (darkmark filament org)

Re: performance of libnet-based tools Mar 01 2005 07:40PM
Matt Bing (matt mutedwarf com)

Steven Alexander Jr. said:
> I've been experimenting with a few different
> libnet-based tools such as Packit and ISIC. If I try
> to generate a high-volume of traffic using these
> tools, with various options and protocols, the error
> rate is extremely high. ISIC says:
>
> Failed to send packet: No buffer space available

It can happen when you try to send packets in a tight loop. You can
tune the code to avoid this, more info here:

http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/89/316789/2003-03-27/2003-04-02/2

[ reply ]

Re: performance of libnet-based tools Mar 01 2005 07:23PM
Frédéric Raynal (frederic raynal security-labs org)