Quoting Monty Ree <chulmin2 (at) hotmail (dot) com [email concealed]>:
> As you know, Redhat 9.0 and below patch is ended at April 30, 2004.
Correct.
> But I think that I have no problem because of fedoralegacy
> (http://www.fedoralegacy.org/)
Correct, but see below.
> But, I guess that fedoralegacy doesn't any patch any more after June,right?
No. It is simply waiting for people to QA the patches before they get
released. If no one will QA them, they stay in testing. So if you want
to see them released, then get people to QA test them.
> So is there any other method or any project which can maintain patch of the
> redhat series?
Progeny has a pay service for RH legacy patches. Or recompile RHEL
patches or FC1 patches when/where appropriate.
> As you know, Redhat 9.0 and below patch is ended at April 30, 2004.
Correct.
> But I think that I have no problem because of fedoralegacy
> (http://www.fedoralegacy.org/)
Correct, but see below.
> But, I guess that fedoralegacy doesn't any patch any more after June,right?
No. It is simply waiting for people to QA the patches before they get
released. If no one will QA them, they stay in testing. So if you want
to see them released, then get people to QA test them.
> So is there any other method or any project which can maintain patch of the
> redhat series?
Progeny has a pay service for RH legacy patches. Or recompile RHEL
patches or FC1 patches when/where appropriate.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Messenger¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿Â¶óÀÎ»ó¿¡ Àִ ģ±¸¿Í ´ëȸ¦ ³ª´©¼¼¿ä.
> http://messenger.msn.co.kr
>
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Why get even? Get odd!
[ reply ]