Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Focus on Linux
redhat patch problem? Sep 01 2004 09:21AM
Monty Ree (chulmin2 hotmail com) (6 replies)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 03 2004 03:32PM
Eric Rostetter (eric rostetter physics utexas edu) (2 replies)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 04 2004 11:32PM
Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 04 2004 02:12PM
Jan Adriaenssens (jan linulex com)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 03 2004 03:31PM
James Carter (jcarter mindmerge net)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 03 2004 03:13PM
Keith Mendoza (pantherse yahoo com)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 03 2004 09:36AM
Ho Chaw Ming (chawming pacific net sg)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 03 2004 09:33AM
Sebastian Berm (bugtraq sebsoft nl) (1 replies)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 07 2004 01:42AM
Eric Rostetter (rostetter mail utexas edu)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 03 2004 07:27AM
Chuq Yang (chuq bigfoot com) (1 replies)
Re: redhat patch problem? Sep 04 2004 12:33PM
Beau Henderson (silentbob gmail com)
We have quite a few colocated servers and were in the same possition
as you. However, i did manage to test out and put together an upgrade
using yum to move to CentOS ( www.centos.org ), which is RHEL, minus
the RH. I've since successfully migrated all of my legacy redhat OS's
using the method I provided here:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=276534

There are also a couple other RHEL rebuilds that I am aware of:

www.taolinux.org
www.whiteboxlinux.org ( might be .com ? ) <- Single developer, little
to no community support

As far as i know this method can not be used to upgrade to RHEL
itself. It may be possible if you build your own local yum repository,
but i've not tried and know of nobody that has.

As we do not require support from redhat we're very comfortable with
our decision.

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 03:27:03 -0400, Chuq Yang <chuq (at) bigfoot (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> you may want to look into yum (YellowDog Updater, Modified) at
> http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum. There is a list of mirrors there that
> you can use in lieu of fedoralegacy. I'm not quite sure if the repositories
> will still keep updating RH9 though.
>
> Chuq
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Monty Ree" <chulmin2 (at) hotmail (dot) com [email concealed]>
> To: <focus-linux (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:21 AM
> Subject: redhat patch problem?
>
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > As you know, Redhat 9.0 and below patch is ended at April 30, 2004.
> > But I think that I have no problem because of fedoralegacy
> > (http://www.fedoralegacy.org/)
> >
> > But, I guess that fedoralegacy doesn't any patch any more after
> June,right?
> >
> > So is there any other method or any project which can maintain patch of
> the
> > redhat series?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Messenger를 í?µí?´ ì?¨ë¼ì¸ì?ì? ì??ë?? ì¹?구ì?? ë??í??를 ë??ë??ì?¸ì??.
> > http://messenger.msn.co.kr
> >
> >
>
>

--
Beau Henderson
JustManaged.com - Affordable Linux Administration & Security Services.

[ reply ]







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus