|
Focus on Linux
Red Hat vs Debian Linux: overall security Nov 27 2006 05:44PM tjanas austin rr com (7 replies) Re: Red Hat vs Debian Linux: overall security Nov 29 2006 10:04PM Uday K. MOORJANI (umoorjani mediaserv net) Re: Red Hat vs Debian Linux: overall security Nov 28 2006 06:18PM Cristobal Palmer (cristobalpalmer gmail com) Re: Red Hat vs Debian Linux: overall security Nov 28 2006 06:09PM Vincent Renardias (vincent renardias com) Re: Red Hat vs Debian Linux: overall security Nov 28 2006 06:06PM Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
shows the following results on subject searches:
Debian: 473
DSA (debian security advisories): 180
Redhat: 147
I went to the Open Source Symposium recently (thanks for the psp!) which
was sponsored by Red Hat. They provided some interesting statistics
regarding security issues, make of them what you will, but I found them
quite interesting. Anyways here's a few of them:
70% of all attacks are now targeted at applications, not operating systems
41.7% of reported CVE vulns are stopped by ExecShield
Time taken to fix critical flaws from the time its available to the
public till the time its fixed:
0 day - 73%
1 day - 95%
2 day - 100%
I don't have a great deal of exposure to debian, however I doubt that
either distro is inherently more insecure than the other.
--jason
PS. I'm in no way affiliated or associated with RedHat, merely an end user.
tjanas (at) austin.rr (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
> I am evaluating the overall security of Red Hat linux vs Debian. I've been told that Debian has many more vulnerabilities than Red Hat. I've also been told that Red Hat is quicker to release security patches than Debian is for the "stable" release. Can someone point me to a good overall assessment of the two? Using this tool: www.securityfocus.com/bid I see that Debian has 17 pages worth of issues but Red Hat has surprisingly few. Am I misinterpreting the results from this tool?
>
>
>
[ reply ]