SecurityFocus

RE: port bonding and taps Oct 02 2003 03:00PM
PPowenski oag com (2 replies)

Re: port bonding and taps Oct 02 2003 06:34PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (1 replies)

Re: port bonding and taps Oct 03 2003 06:04PM
Sam f. Stover (sstover iwc sytexinc com) (1 replies)

Re: port bonding and taps Oct 03 2003 06:46PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (1 replies)

Re: port bonding and taps Oct 03 2003 07:19PM
Sam f. Stover (sstover iwc sytexinc com)

Re: port bonding and taps Oct 02 2003 03:34PM
Sam f. Stover (sstover iwc sytexinc com)

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 11:00 AM, PPowenski (at) oag (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:

> I am using channel bonding with RH 9 and it works great

That's awesome - could you let us know what kind of bandwidth you are
handling? I looked at this some time ago, but had some real concerns
about what kind of traffic it could handle. I never really put it to
the test though, so I can't speak authoritatively.

Also, is there a way to know if you are dropping frames on the bonded
interface? Or do you have to query the individual card statistics,
just like anything else?

____
S.f.Stover
sstover (at) iwc.sytexinc (dot) com [email concealed]

[ reply ]