There are over 30000 CVE vulnerability reports. Many IDS/IPS devices
have around 4000-5000 signature rules. My guess is that these
signatures may cover (detect)around 4000-7000 attacks. 23000 to 26000
CVEs, that is, significant number of CVEs are not covered by IDS/IPS
devices.
I am guessing that there is reason for this. IDS/IPS vendors may be
selecting few CVEs for developing signatures. What is the selection
criteria followed in industry? One criteria, I know is that Network
IDS/IPS devices don't need to worry about attacks that can only be
mounted on the local machine, that is, NIDS/NIPS devices only need to
worry about detection of attacks mounted remotely. Are there any other
considerations?
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig
n=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are over 30000 CVE vulnerability reports. Many IDS/IPS devices
have around 4000-5000 signature rules. My guess is that these
signatures may cover (detect)around 4000-7000 attacks. 23000 to 26000
CVEs, that is, significant number of CVEs are not covered by IDS/IPS
devices.
I am guessing that there is reason for this. IDS/IPS vendors may be
selecting few CVEs for developing signatures. What is the selection
criteria followed in industry? One criteria, I know is that Network
IDS/IPS devices don't need to worry about attacks that can only be
mounted on the local machine, that is, NIDS/NIPS devices only need to
worry about detection of attacks mounted remotely. Are there any other
considerations?
Thanks
Ravi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig
n=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ reply ]