Focus on IDS
CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules May 29 2008 05:32AM
Ravi Chunduru (ravi is chunduru gmail com) (2 replies)
Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jun 03 2008 05:43PM
Enigma (enigma security-fu com) (2 replies)
RE: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jun 03 2008 06:42PM
Dimitris Patsos (dpat space gr)
Hi,

Let me add another complexity dimension in this topic.

Few IDS/IPS vendors can correlate their vulnerability assessment tools
with their IDP products (i.e. McAfee,IBM,Tenable,and a few others). None
of them however, can link vulnerabilities with exploits and IDP
signatures as well, which makes sense since IDP detects attacks (i.e.
one or more vulnerabilities exploited in a predefined -not random-
order) not plain vulnerabilities.

The IDP community -to the best of my knowledge- is still missing a
topological-aware mechanism to produce potential attacks based on real
vulnerabilities found in systems/networks. To this extend, it is still
virtually impossible to eliminate false positives in IDP (learning mode
is a nightmare for those who tried, clearly not an option) while it's
also extremely hard to eliminate false negatives in VA tools (it would
be great if a tool could base verdict upon partially discovered signs of
attacks).

What seems of interest and what I've been working on this for the last
couple of years is to integrate post-incident capabilities (e.g. info
from SIEMs) along with vulnerability scoring (like Mitre's CVSS) into
IDP/VA tools.

This would allow for quite flexible configuration scenarios in IDP,
since vulnerabilities are discovered (VA tool) and (semi)automatically
scored (CVSS), verified (SIEM information) while a smaller set of
signatures (IDP) can detect and block attacks since they can break the
predefined order of vulnerability exploit.

In other words, such a view could allow for policies based on attack
paths and not underlying OS, network topology, collision domains, groups
or VLANs.

Thanks a lot,

Dimitrios Patsos,
Ph.D.(Cand),M.Sc.,CCSE,CCDA,CCSP,CME

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]]
On Behalf Of Enigma
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:44 PM
To: Ravi Chunduru
Cc: Focus IDS
Subject: Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules

Ravi Chunduru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are over 30000 CVE vulnerability reports. Many IDS/IPS devices
> have around 4000-5000 signature rules. My guess is that these
> signatures may cover (detect)around 4000-7000 attacks. 23000 to 26000
> CVEs, that is, significant number of CVEs are not covered by IDS/IPS
> devices.
>
> I am guessing that there is reason for this. IDS/IPS vendors may be
> selecting few CVEs for developing signatures. What is the selection
> criteria followed in industry? One criteria, I know is that Network
> IDS/IPS devices don't need to worry about attacks that can only be
> mounted on the local machine, that is, NIDS/NIPS devices only need to
> worry about detection of attacks mounted remotely. Are there any other
> considerations?
>
> Thanks
> Ravi
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Test Your IDS
>
> Is your IDS deployed correctly?
> Find out quickly and easily by testing it
> with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
> Go to
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig

n=intro_sfw
> to learn more.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
>
>
Couple of things:

1. If you are talking about Network IDS/IPS, not all vulnerabilities
are remotely exploitable. Some local vulnerabilities can only be
detected by a HIDS if they can be detected at all.
2. Keep in mind that CVE is Common **Vulnerability* *and Exposures,
so it covers any vulnerability where IDS/IPS are generally
exploit-centric. How are you going to detect if a vulnerability
is exploited if there is no publicly known exploit? How do you
find something when you don't know what it looks like?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig

n=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig
n=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ reply ]
Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jun 03 2008 06:40PM
Leon Ward (seclists rm-rf co uk) (1 replies)
Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jun 03 2008 07:00PM
Enigma (enigma security-fu com) (1 replies)
Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jun 05 2008 03:09PM
Joel Esler (joel esler mac com)
Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules May 29 2008 06:35PM
Ron Gula (rgula tenablesecurity com) (1 replies)
RE: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jun 02 2008 06:33PM
Srinivasa Addepalli (srao intoto com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus