Focus on IDS
Re: ROI on IDS/IPS products Feb 27 2009 07:07PM
sant-bar dsv su se


What about a risk-based approach for justifying a security investment?

Even in cases when a quantitative risk assessment approach is not possible I find qualitative approach (if effective) can be good enough.

Any thoughts?

It is quite weird for me to see that a telecom is not mature enough vis-a-vis security. Personally I worked for one back in 2004 and I think it was quite ahead at the time.

Cheers,

Santiago

------Original Message------

From: Jeremy Walczak

Sender: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]

To: Ravi Chunduru

To: Focus IDS

Subject: Re: ROI on IDS/IPS products

Sent: 27 Feb 2009 19:47

Interesting paper from SANS. Link below. It in part discusses why

there is no such thing as ROI for security spending, and instead tries

to focus the decision on either an "investment" or "goal" based

justification. Perhaps the paper would help to generate ideas on other

ways to sell the investment to the company.

http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/dlp/rss/the_business_justif
ication_for_data_security_33033

Jeremy

>>> Ravi Chunduru <ravi.is.chunduru (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> 2/27/2009 12:08 PM >>>

I was talking to a junior security administartor working for a big

telecom company.  He said something which is worrying.  After few

years of IPS deployment in particular department, they  decided to

remove IPS devices.  It was felt that they did not find enough ROI to

justify 2 dedicated personnel to monitor and analyze IDS/IPS logs and

reports. It apperas that no major incidents were detected by network

IPS devices.  they felt that signature coverage is either poor or not

timely. i also was told that these IPS devices are from industry

leaders.

Can you share your experiences?  Any examples of successful detection

and prevention of major attacks and penetration by IPS devices.

Thanks

Ravi

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus