|
Focus on IDS
Re: Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 10 2009 08:55AM zubair shafiq yahoo com (1 replies) Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 10 2009 08:40PM Stefano Zanero (s zanero securenetwork it) (1 replies) Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 12 2009 03:40PM \Zow\ Terry Brugger (zow acm org) (3 replies) Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 13 2009 10:56AM Stefano Zanero (zanero elet polimi it) Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 12 2009 10:55PM Stuart Staniford (sstaniford FireEye com) (1 replies) Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 13 2009 11:03AM Stefano Zanero (zanero elet polimi it) (1 replies) Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 12 2009 08:43PM Paul Palmer (paul_palmer us ibm com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
>> is necessarily going to get stale very quickly.
>
> Very true, and so if any dataset is needed this has to be kept in mind.
An anonymous reviewer on one of my papers made the following
observation, which I've taken to heart: The IDS community doesn't need
another static dataset, we need a way to periodically create good
datasets. Much in the way that the KDD community puts out a dataset
for their annual KDD Cup challenge, we should be able to generate a
dataset -- say every year -- representative of both the threats and
background traffic at that time. I rather fancy the idea of letting
all the NIDS researchers have at it and presenting an award for the
best performance at RAID.
Cheers,
Terry
[ reply ]