Focus on IDS
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 13 2009 03:13PM
\Zow\ Terry Brugger (zow acm org) (2 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 14 2009 02:00AM
Seth Hall (hall 692 osu edu)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 13 2009 08:05PM
Paul Palmer (b paul palmer gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 14 2009 12:58AM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 16 2009 06:39PM
Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists tx rr com) (2 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 17 2009 09:43PM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 17 2009 09:01PM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 06:31PM
Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists tx rr com) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 07:39PM
Seth Hall (hall 692 osu edu) (2 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 10:08PM
Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists tx rr com) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 12:49AM
Martin Roesch (roesch sourcefire com) (2 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 03:15PM
Ravi Chunduru (ravi is chunduru gmail com) (2 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 05:32PM
Stefano Zanero (s zanero securenetwork it) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 20 2009 03:00AM
Ravi Chunduru (ravi is chunduru gmail com)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 04:45PM
Seth Hall (hall 692 osu edu)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 09:06AM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl) (2 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 06:45PM
Martin Roesch (roesch sourcefire com)
Hi Damiano,

I didn't say it was easy, I said it was possible. :)

The reason we have rules in the first place it so that you don't have
to write raw C code to detect things and that's a Good Thing as far as
most people are concerned. The point I was making is that Snort *can*
detect anything you want it to, we've built flexibility and
extensibility into it from day one. It may be a little ugly, but the
capability is there.

That said, I prefer that people use the rule language where possible
because it's harder to get yourself in trouble with. Getting
formalized rules primitives in place to do some of these things take a
while though and rule creation can be a near real-time necessity.
That's why things like .so rules exist so users (and Sourcefire) can
provide coverage beyond the capabilities of the detection engine and
the rules language.

Marty

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Damiano Bolzoni
<damiano.bolzoni (at) utwente (dot) nl [email concealed]> wrote:
> On 19/03/2009 1.49, Martin Roesch wrote:
>>
>> You guys do know that anything you can't do in the Snort rules
>> language natively can be done using .so rules, right?  Write your
>> rules in C, store data statefully within Snort, manipulate things like
>> flowbits that other rules can reference, pretty much anything you care
>> to do in C.  The only thing you can't do with it is generate
>> pseudopackets for other subsystems to analyze.
>
> Marty,
> .so rules offer indeed a high degree of personalization. However, you need
> to know what you're doing...it's C code, and we all know what that means. I
> would like to see a "neater" way to do that, with something more similar to
> "normal" Snort rules. I know there is a price to pay for this: I won't be
> able to push the analysis so in depth as with a .so rule. But I believe a
> user would prefer the rule to the C code...perhaps I'm wrong :)
>
> --
> Damiano Bolzoni
>
> damiano.bolzoni (at) utwente (dot) nl [email concealed]
> Homepage http://dies.ewi.utwente.nl/~bolzonid/
> PGP public key http://dies.ewi.utwente.nl/~bolzonid/public_key.asc
> Skype ID: damiano.bolzoni (at) utwente (dot) nl [email concealed]
>
> Distributed and Embedded Security Group - University of Twente
> P.O. Box 217 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands
> Phone +31 53 4892477
> Mobile +31 629 008724
> ZILVERLING building, room 3013
>
>
>

--
Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO, Sourcefire Inc. - +1-410-290-1616
Sourcefire - Security for the Real World - http://www.sourcefire.com
Snort: Open Source IDP - http://www.snort.org

[ reply ]
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 06:25PM
Jim Sansing (Ritasa LLC) (jjsansing verizon net)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 08:21PM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl) (3 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 20 2009 07:13PM
Seth Hall (hall 692 osu edu)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 10:16PM
Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists tx rr com) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 06:33PM
Joel Esler (eslerj gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 08:30PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 09:39PM
Stefano Zanero (s zanero securenetwork it) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 18 2009 10:19PM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 05:29PM
Stefano Zanero (s zanero securenetwork it) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 06:42PM
Stuart Staniford (sstaniford FireEye com) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 06:47PM
Stefano Zanero (zanero elet polimi it) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 19 2009 09:14PM
Damiano Bolzoni (damiano bolzoni utwente nl) (1 replies)
Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Mar 20 2009 06:47PM
Seth Hall (hall 692 osu edu)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus