|
Focus on IDS
IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 12:25PM Hurgel Bumpf (l0rd_lunatic yahoo com) (7 replies) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 07:42PM Trygve Aasheim (trygve pogostick net) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 07:07PM Gary Halleen (ghalleen cisco com) (1 replies) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 30 2009 09:43AM Hurgel Bumpf (l0rd_lunatic yahoo com) (1 replies) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 04:10PM Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists tx rr com) (1 replies) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 06:19PM Joel Esler (eslerj gmail com) (1 replies) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 03:55PM Laurens Vets (laurens daemon be) (1 replies) Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 30 2009 09:26AM Hurgel Bumpf (l0rd_lunatic yahoo com) (1 replies) RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 03:39PM BARDINI, MICHAEL (michael bardini hp com) (1 replies) RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 30 2009 07:55AM Hurgel Bumpf (l0rd_lunatic yahoo com) RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 29 2009 03:32PM Diego Garay (dgaray dacas com) (1 replies) RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint Jul 30 2009 09:21AM Hurgel Bumpf (l0rd_lunatic yahoo com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
David Henning, CISSP, GCPM
Hughes Network Systems, LLC
Principal Security Analyst
301-428-5533
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Hurgel Bumpf
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 8:25 AM
To: focus-ids (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Hi List,
i need to protect a "realtime" website with an inline IPS from (D)DOS attacks.
I had some bad experience with Tippingpoint UnityOne 2400 field test. The device dropped to much sessions until all connectivity was lost.
After that no investigation was not possible as TP logs all attack information with IP address 0.0.0.0
The vendor excused this with the layered technology and passing the IP address from the hardware to the logger would lead to delayed packages)
This is unacceptable.
i'm now looking forward to test a Cisco IPS 4270-20 and a McAfee Network Security 4050 appliance.
Who has a good/bad experience with that devices? Is it true that all devices don't log ip adresses?
My dream appliance would be able to run like in a 7 day learning mode which counts max new sessions per second, max sessions per client aso. After this 7 days it creates a filter with +x% of the learned values and sets these limits active.
A big problem is that i have to install it into the productive system to get the real values. I dont have any fixed values regarding the new sessions per second and i cant just guess and set values and render the system offline.
All information is highly appreciated!
Thank you very much for your time,
Andre
[ reply ]