Threat level definition
Search:
Home
Bugtraq
Vulnerabilities
Mailing Lists
Jobs
Tools
Beta Programs
News
Infocus
Foundations
Microsoft
Unix
IDS
Incidents
Virus
Pen-Test
Firewalls
Columnists
Mailing Lists
Newsletters
Bugtraq
Focus on IDS
Focus on Linux
Focus on Microsoft
Forensics
Pen-test
Security Basics
Vuln Dev
Vulnerabilities
Jobs
Job Opportunities
Resumes
Job Seekers
Employers
Tools
RSS
News
Vulns
Security Research
BugTraq
Back to list
Name:
Email:
*Note: Email address will appear as "user domain ext" to prevent harvesting.
Subject:
Message:
Re: Buffer overflow prevention
Aug 15 2003 09:54AM
Peter Busser (peter trusteddebian org)
Hi!
> > AFAIK all those combined do bring real security against generic exploits.
> "Real security" is not the word.
Even though PaX is better than W^X, it is far from being perfect.
> PaX / Propolice / W^X / non-exec stacks don't solve bugs. What they do is
> to _abort_ execution of a proces...
[ more ]
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus
> > AFAIK all those combined do bring real security against generic exploits.
> "Real security" is not the word.
Even though PaX is better than W^X, it is far from being perfect.
> PaX / Propolice / W^X / non-exec stacks don't solve bugs. What they do is
> to _abort_ execution of a proces...
[ more ]