Tim Newsham wrote:
>> "it's not like this hasn't been reported, and fixed, many times by
>> many others" - so if it's fixed so many times, how come it was still
>> vulnerable, and ISC had to issue their patches?
>
> Because its just a 16-bit field. DNS is broken. Cache poisoning will
> happen. ...
>> "it's not like this hasn't been reported, and fixed, many times by
>> many others" - so if it's fixed so many times, how come it was still
>> vulnerable, and ISC had to issue their patches?
>
> Because its just a 16-bit field. DNS is broken. Cache poisoning will
> happen. ...
[ more ]