Casper.Dik (at) Sun (dot) COM [email concealed] wrote:
>> But then there is the important concept of the "private 0day", a new
>> vulnerability that a malicious person has but has not used yet.
>>
> But the point is there is no such thing as a 0day *vulnerability"; there's
> a 0day exploit, an exploit in the wild before th...
>> But then there is the important concept of the "private 0day", a new
>> vulnerability that a malicious person has but has not used yet.
>>
> But the point is there is no such thing as a 0day *vulnerability"; there's
> a 0day exploit, an exploit in the wild before th...
[ more ]