Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Digg this story   Add to del.icio.us  
WabiSabiLabi Co-Founder Arrested
Dave G., Matasano 2007-11-06

WabiSabiLabi, formerly most famous for bringing to market the first public vulnerability market, has once again made the headlines. This time, one of their co-founders, Roberto Preatoni, has been folded into an ongoing Italian wiretapping scandal. This investagation has been going on for 10 plus months.

Prior to WabiSabiLabi, Roberto worked at Telecom Italia as part of their penetration testing team. Four members of this team have already been arrested back in January for using a Trojan Horse to compromise and monitor Vittorio Colao, the former CEO of the Rizzoli Corriere della Sera publishing group.

From Robert McMillan:

According to the reports, Preatoni helped staff a 10-member “Tiger Team,” ostensibly set up to test Telecom Italiaâ??s information security system. Members of this team are now charged with hacking and spying on Carla Cico, CEO of Brasil Telecom; the Kroll investigative agency; and journalists Fausto Carioti and David Giacalone of the newspaper Libero.

This might actually be one of the biggest challenges for vendors and vulnerability researchers. How far can you really trust that everyone is doing the right thing? If I were a vendor, I would not make the assumption that the vulnerability researcher is trustworthy. This isn’t to say that you should be hostile towards vulnerability researchers. It is simply that you have absolutely no idea how many people a researcher has told about a vulnerability. Given that, I think it makes sense to treat vulnerability reports as if you just found out about your vulnerability through BUGTRAQ.

While obvious, this also speaks to why it is hard to implement a vulnerability market. It is all about trust. And if the buyers and sellers utilizing (or considering utilizing) WSL can’t get past this, I’d say it’s game-over.

As I think about it, probably the best way for vulnerability researchers and vendors to be bridged is through a vulnerability broker. This could be a trusted person or organization that can represent vulnerability researchers whose reputation is at stake when dealing with vendors.

Of course, I am personally not sold on the idea that the sale of vulnerabilities is a good idea.

Finally, from the ‘There’s No Such Thing as Bad Press Dept’:


WSLBlogTN


Comments


The information, views, and opinions contained on this page are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of SecurityFocus.






 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus