Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Security Basics Mode:
(Page 1 of 1259)  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Next >
Re: OT: Can an old NIC driver affect TLS? 2009-11-27
Lubrano di Ciccone, Christophe (DEF BFS) (diciccone ppg com)
Yes

Driver update rollout policy and strategy apply not only to server but also to client

Christophe

----- Original Message -----

From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] <listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]>

To: Securityfocus <security-basics (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]>

Sent: Fri Nov 27 13:04:19 2009
Subject: OT

[ more ]  [ reply ]
OT: Can an old NIC driver affect TLS? 2009-11-27
Paul Halliday (paul halliday gmail com) (1 replies)
I have been troubleshooting a weird latency issue between a web client
and a finance application.

The NIC driver was stamped 2006 and after an update the problem seems
to have disappeared. Does this make sense?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securing Apach

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: OT: Can an old NIC driver affect TLS? 2009-11-27
Adam Mooz (adam mooz gmail com)
Re: Dealing with Scans (portscans, vulnerability, etc.) 2009-11-27
aditya mukadam (aditya mukadam gmail com)
I agree with Jon K.

1) Ideally, your IDS shouldn't be seeing port scan from internet.
Either your Border router or Firewall should block this traffic.
2) Do not ignore scans. You need to know the threats your
network/resource is up against. It could be a start to a potential
attack.
3) It is recomm

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Facebook Police 2009-11-27
netinfinity (netinfinity securitylab gmail com)
"Facebook policy requires the use of one?s real name to sign up, but
they let the police use fake names.."

Sure the policy says that but a lot of people are changing their names
on a daily basis (ok maybe not daily). And majority of those changes
are
just for fun, but never the less they are again

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: [OT] IP Address scheme for branch office 2009-11-26
martin (martiniscool gmail com)
Hi All

Thanks for the replies. In answer to your questions, we are actually
using Class A addresses globally (sorry, I didn't use the actual IP's
in my original plan). The EMEA region has been assigned one Class B
network to sub-divide amongst our offices. So unfortunately the
solutions above wo

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Is snort an overkill for desktop only environment ? 2009-11-26
martin (martiniscool gmail com)
2009/11/26 martin <martiniscool (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]>:
> Hi Guys
>
> Sorry for not responding to this earlier.  First of all, thank you so
> so much for all the replies on this, very much apprecaited.  We've
> decided that we are definitely going to install snort.  Although we
> think we know what all our traf

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-26
Mohamed Aymen SAHLI (sahli aymen gmail com)
Maybe,

-Using local firewalls on these branches to filter outbound traffic to the core

-Centralize the internet access to have all web traffic go through a
filtering appliance such as a Cisco Iron Port or a websense web
security.

-Have an antivirus solution deployed over the campus. I would
r

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Onapsis Research: SAP Security In-Depth Vol. I 2009-11-25
Onapsis Research (research onapsis com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear colleague,

The first volume of the Onapsis' SAP Security In-Depth publication has been released.

SAP Security In-Depth is a free technical publication leaded by the Onapsis Research Labs with the purpose of providing specialized information about

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: whole disk encryption on multi boot laptop 2009-11-25
Alexander Klimov (alserkli inbox ru)
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Adam Mooz wrote:
> For this level of encyption it might be easier for you to get a
> harddrive with hardware encryption

As a professional paranoid I would not recommend using hardware FDE
for anything more than "keeping your kid sister out": you can never be
sure what backdoors

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: When SPAMMERS Pay You ! 2009-11-24
Meta Junkie (metajunkie gmail com) (1 replies)
Shreyas Zare:

From the limited email details you gave, it looks like the message
didn't actually come from PayPal.

Did you actually receive the ten cent deposit into your account?

If I was to wager, just based upon what I see here - I'd say you
didn't. This looks more like a fishing (aka phishin

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: When SPAMMERS Pay You ! 2009-11-25
Shreyas Zare (shreyas technitium com)
scalable syscall proxying 2009-11-24
pleed (pleed koeln ccc de)
Hi there,

some weeks ago i ve read papers about syscall proxying.
When i was looking for implementations, i just found very specific
code (e.g. at ueberwall.org) that could be used for minimal application.

Thats why i thought it could be funny to write my own, scalable syscall
proxy.
My concept in

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Security of information harvesting 2009-11-24
maork-from-ork hotmail com
Hi group,

My client wants to harvest information about his servers (done through a consultant, not internal people) using TreeSize Professional.

http://www.jam-software.com/treesize/

From the screen shots, you can tell that the product is going down to file name level. I don't know if you c

[ more ]  [ reply ]
adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-24
Juan B (juanbabi yahoo com) (2 replies)
Hi all,

I'm doing some security consulting for a client. this client have around 30 remote branches connected to his core. the problem is that sometimes the AV fails to detect new viruses/worms coming from those branches so those viruses/worms mess up his LAN.another problem is that the the client

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-27
aditya mukadam (aditya mukadam gmail com)
RE: adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-25
boaz shunami rsa com (1 replies)
RE: adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-25
Rivest, Philippe (PRivest transforce ca) (1 replies)
RE: adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-25
Juan B (juanbabi yahoo com) (1 replies)
RE: adding another defence layer against viruses/worms 2009-11-25
Rivest, Philippe (PRivest transforce ca)
Dealing with port/vulnerability scans 2009-11-24
Tony Raboza (tonyraboza gmail com) (2 replies)
Hi,

I'm tuning my IDS and I'm thinking of taking out the portscan/web
vulnerability scan rules. Why? Because, yes - I know that somebody
may be scanning my network - but, what can I do about it?

1. Block the IP? But, what if its NAT - meaning only 1
workstation/user did the port scanning, I wou

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Dealing with port/vulnerability scans 2009-11-24
Michael Painter (tvhawaii shaka com)
Res: Dealing with port/vulnerability scans 2009-11-24
Leandro Marques (djleandro10 yahoo com br)
(Page 1 of 1259)  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Next >







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus