David Banisar, special to SecurityFocus 2001-06-04
A few feel-good touches can't redeem the COE treaty, or the closed-door process that produced it.
Colapse all |
Post comment
Problem
2001-06-05
G-14 Classified <g14 (at) sentry (dot) net [email concealed]>
G-14 Classified <g14 (at) sentry (dot) net [email concealed]>
Now how exactly do they determine who is "legitimate" and who isn't? This is a major problem to the furthur development of computer security in my eyes. What do you have to do? be a licensed computer security specialist or CISSP just to write some perl scripts? What is this world coming to?...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Endgame on cybercrime treaty
2001-06-05
Don M. Darragh
Don M. Darragh
Mr. Banisar,
Some thoughts on your excellent article.
It wasn?t too long ago that Norman Rockwell?s pictures confirmed our experiences of life in America. Images of family physicians making house calls. Local pharmacists, policemen, parish priests and neighborhood grocers caring for our wan...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Some thoughts on your excellent article.
It wasn?t too long ago that Norman Rockwell?s pictures confirmed our experiences of life in America. Images of family physicians making house calls. Local pharmacists, policemen, parish priests and neighborhood grocers caring for our wan...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Insanity.
2001-06-06
_clf3_ (1 replies)
_clf3_ (1 replies)
How would the ban on development of security evaluation tools go together with GPL and Berkley licenses ? Would they ban OpenBSD because the official release CD contains Nessus, nmap, l0phtcrack, cgichck etc., ? Are telnet/ftp clients security evaluation tools ? Would I go to jail for running ssh ? ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Unfortunalty, few people understood what happends at this time.
Mat.
...
[ more ] [ reply ]