White House flunks back

White House flunks back
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2000-09-13

The President's cyber-security czar gives Congress an 'F', for Failing to Fund.

The wrong solution will fix nothing. 2000-09-13
(1 replies)

Although Clarke's finger pointed at Congress sounds sensible at first, read on a little and you'll see the real agenda: The Clinton administration wants to create new agencies to deal with the problem of security, meanwhile blaming the Republican Congress for the government's security problems. Whic...

[ more ] [ reply ]

Do you really know what his solution was? 2000-09-14
gwenwyn <gwenwyn (at) geeklife (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)

You make some interesting points... I completely agree with your point about adding a security expert to development teams. As anyone in the computer industry knows, it is much easier (and cheaper) to resolve issues (be they bugs, flaws, or security problems) in the R&D stage than after the product...

[ more ] [ reply ]

Re: Do you really know what his solution was? 2009-01-13
Anonymous

I know this is years after the fact, but I do have to day it's funny that this "expert" doesn't even know what a part of his title means. Since he claims to not know what cyber-terrorism is, how can he be protecting from it? just a thought....

[ more ] [ reply ]