Second OS X worm appears

Second OS X worm appears
Kelly Martin, 2006-02-17

Second OS X worm appears 2006-02-17
Juha-Matti Laurio

The naming process seems to be better than at OSX/Leap.A case. Only names OSX.Inqtana.A, OSX/Inqtana.A and OSX_INQTANA.A (Trend) are in use....

[ more ] [ reply ]

Second OS X worm appears 2006-02-18
Anonymous

That's a very misleading headline. But I guess when you're owned by Symantec and attempting to spread as much FUD as possible, it's to be expected....

[ more ] [ reply ]

Second OS X worm appears 2006-02-20
Anonymous (1 replies)

I have no doubt that if Apple released a version that would run on non apple hardware that these same so called hackers would gladly pay for the OS, I know I would gladly. Even though I run it on Apple hardware....

[ more ] [ reply ]

Re: Second OS X worm appears 2006-04-15
Anonymous (1 replies)

Even If I wanted to or could run the apple os, there are no applications that I care to run. I would not use osx even if it was legally free. I can get everything under linux that I need. All nice and legal and without spending bookoo bucks. ...

[ more ] [ reply ]

Re: Re: Second OS X worm appears 2007-04-25
Anonymous

and that same software runs nicely, and free, on os x too. so your point is? ;P

I currently run os 9/X/Mandriva/Ubuntu/YellowDog/Win95/98/2K/XP/NT on a Mac using variations of virtual-machine and native OS's.

hehe...

[ more ] [ reply ]