Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
Robert Lemos, 2007-10-08
Comments Mode:
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-09
Anonymous (7 replies)
Apple as a business needs to control the iPhone to ensure it can provide professional customer service and upgrades. If unauthorized applications are running on the iPhone imagine the troubleshooting issues that could arise, with customers calling Apple for support would result in a monetary cost....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
Your point of view is flawed. Apple could always revert to the old "reset the phone" to resolve whatever problem the user has.

Under your logic, Microsoft should not allow any software not coming from them to run under the Windows OS ;-)...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Anonymous
And under YOUR logic, Microsoft should allow ANY software to modify ANY system settings and still run perfectly.

Microsoft has published guidelines for how applications are to interact with the operating system. The iPhone is an unfinished work in progress, so it has no such published specific...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
B as in Bull S as in .... 2007-10-10
Anonymous
At several hundred dollars for a device that costs no more than $50 to produce, There's lots of margin for technical support. The question is whether Apple has the legal authority to lock the purchasers of it's devices into AT&T's service. The telecom competition laws of the US say no. Whether Apple...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
No, it doesn't. 2007-10-10
Anonymous
Apple can simply refuse to provide service on modified phones.

That's normal practice; nobody would object to that....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Anonymous
Next thing you might say that Microsoft needs to lock Windows OS to not allow other software?...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Oofus Funnybutt IV
Fsck Apple. I as a consumer need to do as I wish with my private property.

There is a very big difference between only providing support for devices which are untampered and the deliberate, willful, and malicious destruction of someone else's property.

If people spent a little more time worry...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-15
Anonymous
The issue is Apple is not allowing you to use their phone on another network.

If you think it's for quality control, you have no clue of the law....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2008-03-15
Anonymous
In that case they should input something in the terms of service...don't go around breaking something that someone paid hundreds of dollars for. Thats crap, imagine if you had a car with big rims or a nice sterio system installed and you took your vehicle to the dealership to get serviced and they ...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-09
Anonymous (2 replies)
How is modifying say a PSP different to the iPhone? It isn't! They both come under the DMCA. I don't believe ever hearing of any cases of people taking Sony to court....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Anonymous
The U.S. office in charge of creating allowed exceptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) has granted researchers the right to hack the security preventing interoperability of wireless phones with other carriers' networks and to reverse engineer the digital rights management on audio C...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Oofus Funnybutt IV (1 replies)
I don't believe Sony has ever deliberately destroyed people's personal property.

I haven't seen an iPhone hack that either: circumvents a measure that prevents unauthorized access to a copyrighted work, or circumvents a measure that prevents the unauthorized copying of a copyrighted work.

How ...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
red f;pud (1 replies)
Yes, Sony has destroyed other people's property, and they were sued for it by the Texas AG.

Remember the Rootkit?...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Re: Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-12
Oofus Funnybutt IV
Sony was not sued for destroying property. The Texas attorney general sued under the state's 2005 spyware law.

Oofus!...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
If Apple purposely bricked people I could understand the law suit. My understanding is that a few people were accidently bricked that had not tampered with their phones. Others were warned that if the had modified the phone then there was a potential it would not work. I don't see bad faith on Ap...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-11
Anonymous
youo don't think they purposefully bricked phones? they got so paranoid about it, they even bricked phones that *weren't* modified... makes me wanna see the update's source code, so i can look and see where they do a checksum of the os, followed by a nice clean wipe if it doesn't match.

shame on ...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-10
Anonymous
Why do people buy crappy iPhones if they don't like the services/operators it comes with? Just get a Nokia....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-11
Anonymous
This thieveing lawyer will get millions and millions for this. iPhone prices will probably go back up. iPhone owners will probably get a certificate for 10 free iTunes or something siminlar...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update 2007-10-12
RobertGile
If they win this, will that leave other companies open to lawsuit? Microsoft releases patches that mess up people's computers all the time. I can remember one in which they removed teh Java Virtual Machine that broke everything Java based until you installed Sun's Java....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
You can't sue Apple for providing a free update - even if you don't like it 2008-03-15
Scotty The Crazy Tech Guy
Apple has a contract with AT&T for one. Apple has to respect the contract. But not everyone likes AT&T, therefore those who want an iPhone but not AT&T hack. You buy the iPhone to use it as they sold it. Anything beyond that is the wild west and prepare for the worst. If you accept the update, know ...

[ more ]  [ reply ]







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus