Robert Lemos, 2007-10-08
Colapse all |
Post comment
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-09
Anonymous (7 replies)
Anonymous (7 replies)
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Your point of view is flawed. Apple could always revert to the old "reset the phone" to resolve whatever problem the user has.
Under your logic, Microsoft should not allow any software not coming from them to run under the Windows OS ;-)...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Under your logic, Microsoft should not allow any software not coming from them to run under the Windows OS ;-)...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-10
Anonymous
Anonymous
And under YOUR logic, Microsoft should allow ANY software to modify ANY system settings and still run perfectly.
Microsoft has published guidelines for how applications are to interact with the operating system. The iPhone is an unfinished work in progress, so it has no such published specific...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Microsoft has published guidelines for how applications are to interact with the operating system. The iPhone is an unfinished work in progress, so it has no such published specific...
[ more ] [ reply ]
B as in Bull S as in ....
2007-10-10
Anonymous
Anonymous
At several hundred dollars for a device that costs no more than $50 to produce, There's lots of margin for technical support. The question is whether Apple has the legal authority to lock the purchasers of it's devices into AT&T's service. The telecom competition laws of the US say no. Whether Apple...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-10
Oofus Funnybutt IV
Oofus Funnybutt IV
Fsck Apple. I as a consumer need to do as I wish with my private property.
There is a very big difference between only providing support for devices which are untampered and the deliberate, willful, and malicious destruction of someone else's property.
If people spent a little more time worry...
[ more ] [ reply ]
There is a very big difference between only providing support for devices which are untampered and the deliberate, willful, and malicious destruction of someone else's property.
If people spent a little more time worry...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2008-03-15
Anonymous
Anonymous
In that case they should input something in the terms of service...don't go around breaking something that someone paid hundreds of dollars for. Thats crap, imagine if you had a car with big rims or a nice sterio system installed and you took your vehicle to the dealership to get serviced and they ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-09
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
How is modifying say a PSP different to the iPhone? It isn't! They both come under the DMCA. I don't believe ever hearing of any cases of people taking Sony to court....
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-10
Anonymous
Anonymous
The U.S. office in charge of creating allowed exceptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) has granted researchers the right to hack the security preventing interoperability of wireless phones with other carriers' networks and to reverse engineer the digital rights management on audio C...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-10
Oofus Funnybutt IV (1 replies)
Oofus Funnybutt IV (1 replies)
I don't believe Sony has ever deliberately destroyed people's personal property.
I haven't seen an iPhone hack that either: circumvents a measure that prevents unauthorized access to a copyrighted work, or circumvents a measure that prevents the unauthorized copying of a copyrighted work.
How ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
I haven't seen an iPhone hack that either: circumvents a measure that prevents unauthorized access to a copyrighted work, or circumvents a measure that prevents the unauthorized copying of a copyrighted work.
How ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-10
red f;pud (1 replies)
red f;pud (1 replies)
Yes, Sony has destroyed other people's property, and they were sued for it by the Texas AG.
Remember the Rootkit?...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Remember the Rootkit?...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
If Apple purposely bricked people I could understand the law suit. My understanding is that a few people were accidently bricked that had not tampered with their phones. Others were warned that if the had modified the phone then there was a potential it would not work. I don't see bad faith on Ap...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Apple sued for iPhone's anti-hack update
2007-10-11
Anonymous
Anonymous
youo don't think they purposefully bricked phones? they got so paranoid about it, they even bricked phones that *weren't* modified... makes me wanna see the update's source code, so i can look and see where they do a checksum of the os, followed by a nice clean wipe if it doesn't match.
shame on ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
shame on ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
You can't sue Apple for providing a free update - even if you don't like it
2008-03-15
Scotty The Crazy Tech Guy
Scotty The Crazy Tech Guy
Apple has a contract with AT&T for one. Apple has to respect the contract. But not everyone likes AT&T, therefore those who want an iPhone but not AT&T hack. You buy the iPhone to use it as they sold it. Anything beyond that is the wild west and prepare for the worst. If you accept the update, know ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]

[ more ] [ reply ]