Mark Rasch, 2004-07-26
A federal court recently ruled that website privacy policies aren't binding, because nobody reads them. The implications are far reaching for contract law and the Internet.
Colapse all |
Post comment
Shrink wrapped and click through agreements challenged?
2004-07-26
John the Kiwi (1 replies)
John the Kiwi (1 replies)
Shrink wrapped and click through agreements challenged?
2004-07-27
Y (1 replies)
Y (1 replies)
And even if SW and CTAs are unaffected directly, are they still invalidated when the person reading them (eg a technician) has no authority to enter into such an agreement on behalf of their company....
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Shrink wrapped and click through agreements challenged?
2004-08-03
Anonymous
Anonymous
Here's a quote directly from Microsoft when I asked them a year or so ago:
Thanks for your questions about how a technician should deal with the
EULA acceptance issue. You correctly observe that Microsoft intends
that the EULA be accepted by the end user and that as a practical
matter, techni...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Thanks for your questions about how a technician should deal with the
EULA acceptance issue. You correctly observe that Microsoft intends
that the EULA be accepted by the end user and that as a practical
matter, techni...
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-26
Anonymous- Your Not Data-mining Me! (1 replies)
Anonymous- Your Not Data-mining Me! (1 replies)
Does this then mean that all those 'legal agreements' we must click through to use MS or other Software are also meaningless because nobody reads them? I would gladly give up my personal info. to the Gov't and NorthWest in exchange for 'piracy with impunity'!...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-28
Anonymous Amateur
Anonymous Amateur
i am curious how far it can be twisted and stretched:
if i buy a copy of Windows and install it on my three computers without reading EULA, although i click to say "agree" for installation, i am in no way bound by EULA because 1) i bought a copy which is now "my property" and in no way MS's and 2...
[ more ] [ reply ]
if i buy a copy of Windows and install it on my three computers without reading EULA, although i click to say "agree" for installation, i am in no way bound by EULA because 1) i bought a copy which is now "my property" and in no way MS's and 2...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Looks Like a Duck, Smells Like a Duck...it's a Pineapple
2004-07-26
Dave
Dave
Sounds similar to the agreements and acceptable use policy of Gmail. Gmail attempts to hold the user to a higher standard than the company itself is held to. For example, Gmail states that it limits the property rights of the e-mail consumer but does not limit its own liability if Gmail abuses it. I...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
did not belong to the customer, because the customer "voluntarily provided some information that was included" in the information given to the government, and that when Northwest "compiled and combined" this information with other data it "became Northwest's property."
So, would this be invalid ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
So, would this be invalid ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Rogue state
2004-07-28
Louis Bertrand
Louis Bertrand
European and Canadian law places tough controls on how private corporations manage personal information: privacy, access to one's own record. The USA is rapidly becoming the Typhoid Mary of the international community, despite the best lobbying and arm-twisting efforts of the State Dept.
http://w...
[ more ] [ reply ]
http://w...
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-29
L. Kelly
L. Kelly
In this column Mr. Rasch states that consumers "only voluntarily provided this information to Northwest because the airline made certain promises and representations about its privacy and security." I don't quite believe this is true. I provide that information to the airlines in order to book a fli...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-29
Anonymous
Anonymous
What's the big deal? Companies have been capturing, storing, using and sharing your personal information since way before the Internet. Sure today that information flows more easily and if companies and people don't make some reasonable efforts to secure the information it will leak and may lead t...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-29
Anonymous
Anonymous
I wonder if you can Copywrite/Register/Trademark your personal information so that legally it is still your information.
I am not "voluntarily" giving up my information. In fact, I'm forced to. If I want to use their services, they require me to give them my information. In that, I assume they...
[ more ] [ reply ]
I am not "voluntarily" giving up my information. In fact, I'm forced to. If I want to use their services, they require me to give them my information. In that, I assume they...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Won't this also apply to the disclaimer?
2004-07-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
If the agreement isn't binding because I didn't read it, then the disclaimer shouldn't be either.
I didn't read the disclaimer, so they should be liable for any and all damages I suffered as a result of my dealings with their organization.
We might even be able to make it a civil case.
But, I...
[ more ] [ reply ]
I didn't read the disclaimer, so they should be liable for any and all damages I suffered as a result of my dealings with their organization.
We might even be able to make it a civil case.
But, I...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Won't this also apply to the disclaimer?
2004-07-30
Anonymous
Anonymous
This is why I use a fake email and fake name/ address for everything I sign up for online. This whole airline thing can be summed up in 2 words "Patriot Act" That is why they gave the government the information. Who is to say that they were not holding your "security" in your best interest when they...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Won't this also apply to the disclaimer?
2004-07-29
Anonymous
Anonymous
If the agreement isn't binding because I didn't read it, then the disclaimer shouldn't be either.
I didn't read the disclaimer, so they should be liable for any and all damages I suffered as a result of my dealings with their organization.
We might even be able to make it a civil case.
But, I...
[ more ] [ reply ]
I didn't read the disclaimer, so they should be liable for any and all damages I suffered as a result of my dealings with their organization.
We might even be able to make it a civil case.
But, I...
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-07-30
Anonymous
Anonymous
Interesting the SecurityFocus privacy policies security clause says "This site has security measures in place to protect the loss, misuse and alteration of the information under our control"
Is this a promise that never in any way will customers data be compromised? 100% Security wow - tell me ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Is this a promise that never in any way will customers data be compromised? 100% Security wow - tell me ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-08-02
Steerpike
Steerpike
I think that parts of the District Court's decision are alarming, however, I think it worth pointing out that there are some significant limitations on its scope. To take one example, two of the most promsing claims, one made under the MN Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the other a based on common l...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
A Promise Falls in the Forest
2004-08-02
Anonymous
Anonymous
I propose we all cancel our credit cards after each purchase, then open a new account with the same credit card company. If we all did that once or twice the credit card companies might start making some noise, don't you think???
Better yet, cancel your credit card, open a new account, then refus...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Better yet, cancel your credit card, open a new account, then refus...
[ more ] [ reply ]

I'm more interested in the challenges this makes to shrink-wrapped and click through agreements. Will this decision actually filter through these agreements?...
[ more ] [ reply ]