Daniel Hanson, 2005-04-27
Linspire's arguments to only run a desktop system as root has everything to do with privilege seperation, privilege escalation, and some design choices made along the way.
Colapse all |
Post comment
Cleanliness next to Rootliness
2005-04-28
josh
josh
Well said Daniel! I agree with you and would go so far as to say that if Linspire insists on continuing with their current policy of user access that they will go through the same learning process that Microsoft has gone through and learn that separation of privilege is an incredible benefit to sec...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Cleanliness next to Rootliness
2005-04-28
Anonymous
Anonymous
Thanks for finally bringing that up. I wasn't sure if Linspire/Lindows was still continuing with this practice. I think it's sad that a lot of windows users still use their computer as an admin account. If Linspire is trying to get people to switch (which I could care less about, honestly), why w...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Cleanliness next to Rootliness
2005-04-28
SFN
SFN
If what I want is an OS that puts no limits on user privileges so that my grandmother can change her wallaper (or anything else about her system), why wouldn't I just have my grandmother use Windows?
Because Linspire is free? It's not.
Because the software to be added to Linspire is free? It o...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Because Linspire is free? It's not.
Because the software to be added to Linspire is free? It o...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Cleanliness next to Rootliness
2005-04-28
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
I think Robertson's own example (of having your user data files wiped) is the best argument against running everything as root. Sure, you've lost all your data. If your account isn't root, though, the system itself is protected, including other accounts and things like your backup and restore softwa...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Cleanliness next to Rootliness
2005-04-28
dph - author
dph - author
Personally, I think anyone who only worries about the harm that they can see shouldn't be in the security business.
If your biggest problem is someone (maybe you) deleting your data, or you system, you aren't paranoid enough.
The real harm comes when you CAN'T see what is happening. I'm para...
[ more ] [ reply ]
If your biggest problem is someone (maybe you) deleting your data, or you system, you aren't paranoid enough.
The real harm comes when you CAN'T see what is happening. I'm para...
[ more ] [ reply ]
"Most important" - oh no...
2005-05-04
Phlebas
Phlebas
"What's the most important thing on your desktop? It's the data."
Not quite. It's true that by breaching your defenses a bad guy will gain access to your data, and that's bad. But there are two sets of data not on your desktop that are equally important:
1. Your data elsewhere. E.g. in the ban...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Not quite. It's true that by breaching your defenses a bad guy will gain access to your data, and that's bad. But there are two sets of data not on your desktop that are equally important:
1. Your data elsewhere. E.g. in the ban...
[ more ] [ reply ]

[ more ] [ reply ]