Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Microsoft's most successful failure
Mark Burnett, 2005-06-06

Someone once asked Pable Picasso which one of his many paintings was his favorite. His reply: [i]the next one[/i]. Ask Steve Ballmer which version of Windows is the most secure and guess what his answer will be?

Comments Mode:
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
buuuuh. yes, eventually they might get their software right (or, let's just say, better than it was). but from a giant like micro$oft I would have expected something more.
let's not forget that those bugs have been found black-box by people with no association with microsoft. some of them were ridi...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-10
Anonymous
It´s cheaper to roll em out, and let the consumer base to test it for free :)...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
Anonymous
This is a really lame article written by a 'MS fan'
U still can use the words 'secure' and 'windows' in just one soley sentence: 'Windows is NOT secure'

It may be right, that Blaster and Sasser only were that 'successful' because of admins not updating their windows. It is also true, that if u i...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
keydet89
Another MS-bashing article? Come on, Mark...can't you find something better to do? Can you go back to the techie, problem-solving type of articles you used to do?

H. Carvey
"Windows Forensics and Incident Recovery"
http://www.windows-ir.com
http://windowsir.blogspot.com
...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
Coldman
> It may take another decade and a few more product versions before Microsoft can finally claim victory over security issues

It will take ages. Problem is - humans. They are the weakest link possible, and I am not sure this may be changed someday...
...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
Wybnormal (1 replies)
MS doesnt have a decade. Even now we are seeing the beginning of the end much like Aston-Tate. With linux and now Apple on Intel chips and Long horn at least a year a half out, MS has serious issues. If Windows 2003 server is a precurser to Long Horn, the security model is going to suck. In order t...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-08
Keydet89
Can you specify what you're referring to? Which apps? What security has to be "turned off"?

Thanks,
keydet89 at yahoo dot com...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
Vasu (2 replies)
You are one of teh very few security people that is in touch with reality. Thank you for that. Atleast, its not the same old "MS is evil, Open source is good" mantra....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-08
Anonymous
How many times you have to be kicked in your balls before you realize that you're getting kicked for real? How long will you believe in "secure Windows"?...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-11
Gilbert
Ofcourse. Really people realise their fault, when they were hacked.Otherwise they won't bother about that....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft Apologist 2005-06-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Wow. That was sad.

So, in effect, you're saying that Microsoft's incompetent coding is a *good thing*?

"My mother-in-law talks about firewalls. My neighbor can now use the word phishing in a sentence. And the other day I overheard my son explaining to his younger brother the evils of spyware....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Re: Microsoft Apologist 2005-06-12
Anonymous
oh right. And we shouldn't know about locking our doors, or locking our car doors. Or know about alarms for cars or homes?

Get real!...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
greybeard
Nice,
1. Make bad software,
2.Ingore all advice from experienced security professionals outside of the company
3. Screwup the recovery.
4. Keep a lock on the market

If that is not an effective monopoly, then what is?...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-07
Anonymous
Good article outlining Microsoft.

One key point is how Microsoft really influences the average computer user. I mean, what average person really WANTS to know what a firewall is?

Microsoft made sure anyone that opened a new box found out, quickly....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-08
Eagle Creek
Hey!

I really like colums like this! Great :thumb:...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-09
Anonymous
"The challenge here is one that Microsoft is uniquely suited to solve."

Well, yes. The creator of a problem is always uniquely suited to solve it....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-10
Anonymous
Fantastic review!The fact remains that Microsoft is embedded into computing.Unspecialized/Naive users are not even aware that they have a number of options to choose from,with a little learning/change,which no one is comfortable with.As a result,we as administrators are left with only one option,and...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-10
m0rpheus
I completely agree with the author. Nothing more to say....

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's Most Successful Failure 2005-06-13
Tonetheman
This article is REALLY slanted. The blame for the MS security fixes fall squarely on the shoulders of MS and almost no one else. If the coders who write ATM software took this guys advice, then older ATMs we be easy to hack since security was not so important back a few years ago.

It is true that...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's most successful failure 2005-06-15
Bizz
I'm not an MS fan. But...its not like much of the Open-Source software is much more secure. I believe that MS has had/will have the most security issues because they have the largest market share. Who wants to expend the effort to break into the minority when its much more lucrative to break into ...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's most successful failure 2005-06-16
Anonymous
Even a fully patched windows machine can be cracked and not because of unknown issues, but issues which are in the public domain but remain unpatched for a lengthy amount of time.

I think once one switches from a windows server to an open source server, over coming there issues does one realise h...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's most successful failure 2005-06-17
rorobtz
Just an information. Common Criteria are used to evaluate the security assurance of products.

Solaris 9 has EAL4 Augmented
Windows 2000 has EAL4 Augmented
Linux Red Hat has EAL3 Augmented
Linux SuSe has EAL3 Augmented
Mac OS X has EAL3

etc ...

see http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/vpl/vpl_...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
Microsoft's most successful failure 2005-06-20
Chris Grove
People that cant make Windows secure should stick to their Linux. I've made a windows box withstand all types of attacks. Just like any OS, after the initial install is done you have to HARDEN the system. If there's no need to harden the system, then why are we making the big bucks doing so? Oth...

[ more ]  [ reply ]
The line that launched save2000.ca 2008-03-09
Gordon Fecyk
"Windows 2000 was their most successful failure so far."

Thank-you Mister Burnett! Thank-you so very much, for this priceless quote that I can use against InfoWorld's absurd SaveXP campaign....

[ more ]  [ reply ]







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus