Mark Rasch, 2006-07-31
Even with a well-heeled corporate privacy policy stating that all employee communications may be monitored in the workplace, the legality of e-mail monitoring is not as clear cut as one might think.
Colapse all |
Post comment
E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-07-31
Mike Smith (1 replies)
Mike Smith (1 replies)
BTW, this also goes along the idea or notion that if you do something that you're NOT supposed to do at work, DON'T DO IT. Corporations are looking for any excuse to fire or layoff people nowadays -- DON'T GIVE THEM A REASON TO MIGRATE YOUR DIVISION OR COMPANY OFFSHORE.
It's pretty simple. If y...
[ more ] [ reply ]
It's pretty simple. If y...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-11-15
Anonymous
Anonymous
But what if it doesn't belong to them? Say I'm at home and I receive an email (a forwarded email)on my PC that I purchased, using an ISP that I pay for. But the email is about another co worker doing some bad things. I'm angry so I forward this email to personal recipients in my address book (yes...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-07-31
Anonymous
Anonymous
Maybe I am wrong here but...
If you work for a corporation then you are acting as an agent for that entity. Therefore any communication you make on behalf of that entity (e-mail, fax, voice, video) is in fact the corporation's property.
So why in the world would anyone expect privacy in the work...
[ more ] [ reply ]
If you work for a corporation then you are acting as an agent for that entity. Therefore any communication you make on behalf of that entity (e-mail, fax, voice, video) is in fact the corporation's property.
So why in the world would anyone expect privacy in the work...
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-02
Craig S Wright (2 replies)
Craig S Wright (2 replies)
This is easy. This is commonly fixed by the general contractual terms that most good lawyers will employ.
Terms may be expressly agreed into a contract. ANY contract. The of a GOOD contract will include terms state the choice of terms , choice of venue and the subject matter jurisdiction etc.
...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Terms may be expressly agreed into a contract. ANY contract. The of a GOOD contract will include terms state the choice of terms , choice of venue and the subject matter jurisdiction etc.
...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-02
Mark D. Rasch (2 replies)
Mark D. Rasch (2 replies)
Ah.. that takes care of the consent of the employee.. what about consent of the other party?...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-03
Todd Knaarr (2 replies)
Todd Knaarr (2 replies)
I'd bear in mind, though, that contracts don't trump the law. Depending on how the law's written it may apply in addition to any terms of the contract, or it may trump any terms in the contract....
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Re: E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-04
Anonymous
Anonymous
You are taking of innominate terms or terms implied through statute.
Again ther eis provision to chose the location that the dispute will be decided. This trumps many of the issues as the civil complainant has to be heard in the specified juristiction.
Criminal breaches are a separate matter...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Again ther eis provision to chose the location that the dispute will be decided. This trumps many of the issues as the civil complainant has to be heard in the specified juristiction.
Criminal breaches are a separate matter...
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Regarding the phone calls between California and Georgia being monitored and recorded at the Georgia end, why is this communication not subject to Federal law as opposed to State law? The Federal law should supersede, IMHO, becaue of the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article 1 Clause 3). IANAL, thou...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-04
Mark D. Rasch
Mark D. Rasch
Under the Commerce Clause and the Supremacy Clause, federal law supercedes state law when it is intended to "occupy the field." The history of Title III (the wiretap law) indicates that it applies ONLY to wiretaps by federal agents, or wiretaps to be used in federal court, and that states are free ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Take measures yourself to protect YOUR privacy...
2006-08-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
If you don't want others to read your e-mail, YOU should take the initiative to secure it properly; this includes a complete anti-theft solution, not just encryption. In addition to simply encrypting email and attachments, senders should use software that enables them to assign rights to recipients ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Take measures yourself to protect YOUR privacy...
2006-08-18
Anonymous
Anonymous
the article you provided seems to be more about how companies can protect themsleves and monitor their email, which is also useful for companies who are interested in protecting company IP.
Then again, individuals could also use anti-theft email too for their own IP and data on their comp. Cool ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Then again, individuals could also use anti-theft email too for their own IP and data on their comp. Cool ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
So how do you mitigate the risk of the ECPA
2006-08-10
Scott (1 replies)
Scott (1 replies)
Mark, what steps can employers take to mitigate the risk of the ECPA? What is "unlawful interception of communication and what is lawful?"
Does the provider exception give system administrators and security personel the green light to monitor inbound/outbound company provided or private (such as...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Does the provider exception give system administrators and security personel the green light to monitor inbound/outbound company provided or private (such as...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: So how do you mitigate the risk of the ECPA
2006-08-25
Dan
Dan
Scott:
Great point. Employers have a vested interest to monitor communications. We don't monitor just because we can; I would argue that to stand the test of legality, we must prove that the monitoring was essential to the the employer's protection of her ability to continue to operate her busi...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Great point. Employers have a vested interest to monitor communications. We don't monitor just because we can; I would argue that to stand the test of legality, we must prove that the monitoring was essential to the the employer's protection of her ability to continue to operate her busi...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Question ab't E-mail privacy in the workplace
2006-08-28
Penguinisto
Penguinisto
Okay, so how does the email admin (and by extension, backup/Disaster Recovery) fit into this? After all, email is routinely backed-up, troubleshooting a balky SMTP server sometimes means looking into the contents of an active mail queue to see/prove mangled email (so you know if a problem stems loca...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace
2006-10-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Here is a question for you. How about this scenario. A COO of a small (10 person company) who also manages the server (supposingly to ward off spam, viruses and crashes) has been reading personal emails of the CEO, officer manager, human resource manager (you get the point) and has SHARED informatio...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace
2007-01-16
Anonymous
Anonymous
I quit company A with a no future business dealings provision in my contract. I worked in exchange for ownership of software for two of the owners of company A who had a company B. Unknown to me and over false denials one of the owners of company B was secretly using company A equipment to record my...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace
2007-02-26
Anonymous
Anonymous
I had a co-worker get on my email on my computer (the only way she could access it) and forward it to herself. It was an email I sent to my boss. She then turned around and got an email off another computer from my boss to her boss and forwarded to herself. She then walked out and abandoned her j...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace
2007-11-05
Anonymous
Anonymous
What about when an ex-employer steals private emails from a former employee and send threatening notes based on this stolen info?
Ex employee sends note using private email account to private person. Since the former employer has this person's Blackberry and the personal account is on it, they c...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Ex employee sends note using private email account to private person. Since the former employer has this person's Blackberry and the personal account is on it, they c...
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace (HEARSAY)
2008-03-05
Anonymous
Anonymous
I thought it was interesting that email forwarding basically ends your right to privacy. How can you expect privacy if you can't guarantee what will happen to your email once you hit the send button?
Then I thought...Does email forwarding basically mean it becomes hearsay evidence. Meaning..it ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Then I thought...Does email forwarding basically mean it becomes hearsay evidence. Meaning..it ...
[ more ] [ reply ]
E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace
2009-02-20
Anonymous
Anonymous
Question: Does anybody know if there is way a employer can find out what type of website I visit from my home computer? IF the employer went to the owner of the website and said "give me list email address that logged on to your site over the lst 30 days." Can they do that? Would the website com...
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]

Also, the stipulation of who owns what (to me) is stil "fuzzy", and the logic going behind it makes almost no sense any mor...
[ more ] [ reply ]