Mark Rasch, 2007-01-22
Apple's iPhone announcement and Cisco's iPhone trademark lawsuit has brought the iPhone moniker into the spotlight. But other companies also own and use iPhone trademarks, and market and sell their iPhone products. Mark Rasch explains how U.S. trademark law works and the real issues at play in this highly publicized trademark dispute.
Colapse all |
Post comment
iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
2007-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Very nice article... but I don't understand why publishing it on this website. I didn't see anything security related, no?
...
[ more ] [ reply ]
...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
2007-01-22
editor (1 replies)
editor (1 replies)
I'll admit it's a bit of a stretch re: security, but most companies that sell a product or service have to worry about how to secure their trademarks for future earnings. Something different for readers to enjoy.
cheers,
-editor...
[ more ] [ reply ]
cheers,
-editor...
[ more ] [ reply ]
Re: Re: iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
2007-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
2007-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Great article. Something a lawyer wrote that I actually enjoyed. If Apple is awarded the letter "i" then I better grab a letter too. There are only 26 of them to go around. For this reason I don't agree with the argument that Apple puts "i" before everyone so it is theirs....
[ more ] [ reply ]
[ more ] [ reply ]
Abandonment issues
2007-01-22
chort (1 replies)
chort (1 replies)
Nice article, but unless I'm going cross-eyed I didn't see anything on the abandonment of registered marks. I've read another article recently that indicates marks are only good for a few years unless you continuously have a product bearing that mark for sale.
When Linksys originally brought the...
[ more ] [ reply ]
When Linksys originally brought the...
[ more ] [ reply ]

[ more ] [ reply ]