|
Colapse all |
Post message
Symantec SecurityResponse Writeup of OSX.RSPlug.A 2007-11-01 Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) <http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=20 07-110101-2320-99&tabid=1> Risk Level 1: Very Low TinyURL: http://tinyurl.com/2cwky6 Security Response Researcher Focus-Apple Moderator ________________________________________ Todd D. Woodward Technical Support Engineer Net [ more ] [ reply ] Mac Trojan 2007-11-01 David Harley (david a harley gmail com) (1 replies) For those who are waiting for corroboration/further info, I gather Sophos and McAfee have added detection. Sophos have a press release at http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2007/11/mac-osx-trojan.h tml and McAfee have a blog worth reading http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/. I'm not [ more ] [ reply ] Re: Mac Trojan 2007-11-01 Dave Schroeder (das doit wisc edu) (1 replies) Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Roland Dobbins (rdobbins cisco com) (5 replies) RE: Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Thor \(Hammer of God\) (thor hammerofgod com) Re: Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Edward R. Marczak (marczak radiotope com) RE: Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies) Re: Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Edward R. Marczak (marczak radiotope com) (1 replies) RE: Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) Re: Privileged vs. non-privileged? (was Re: Mac Trojan) 2007-11-01 Dave Schroeder (das doit wisc edu) RE: How Leopard Addresses Security - New malware alert 2007-11-01 David Harley (david a harley gmail com) I know I risk another bozo hatemailstorm by posting this, but I know there are people on this list who are interested in/concerned about this issue. There's a decent quick 'n' dirty analysis at http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3595 by Bojan Zdrnja, who is not a trained parrot. I will not was [ more ] [ reply ] Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? 2007-10-31 Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies) Although not specifically security related, virtualization is quite a bit in security testing and research... The following article for your consideration and discussion: Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard By Adam C. Engst http://db.tidbits.com/article/9277 My only comment is that this is [ more ] [ reply ] Re: Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? 2007-10-31 Dave Schroeder (das doit wisc edu) (1 replies) RE: Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? 2007-10-31 Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2007/10/31/crimeware-co
mes-to-os-x/
Additionally, US-CERT has issued a Current Activity warning today at
http://www.us-cert.gov/current/#mac_dns_changer_trojan
US-CERT points to the very coverage ISC Diary
[ more ] [ reply ]