|
Colapse all |
Post message
RE: Security Configuration Settings? 2004-09-24 Gregory Hicks (ghicks cadence com) > From: "Wiest, Damian" <dmwiest (at) rc2corp (dot) com [email concealed]> > To: "'Gregory Hicks'" <ghicks> > Cc: "'focus-sun (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]'" <focus-sun (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]> > Subject: RE: Security Configuration Settings? > Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:36:55 -0500 > [...snip...] > > > This tells the system to get ALL user inf [ more ] [ reply ] RE: Security Configuration Settings? 2004-09-24 Wiest, Damian (dmwiest rc2corp com) > -----Original Message----- > From: Gregory Hicks [mailto:ghicks (at) cadence (dot) com [email concealed]] > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:23 AM > To: mr.nasty (at) ix.netcom (dot) com [email concealed]; focus-sun (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]; > jdavid (at) skynet (dot) be [email concealed] > Subject: Re: Security Configuration Settings? [snip] > This tells the system to get ALL u [ more ] [ reply ] Re: Security Configuration Settings? 2004-09-23 Gregory Hicks (ghicks cadence com) > From: "Jan David" <jdavid (at) skynet (dot) be [email concealed]> > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:24:48 +0200 > > The compat setting allows you to add an extra pseudo database called > 'passwd_compat'. Here you can specify an alternative database, next to > files. > > E.g.: > > passwd: compat > passwd_compat: ldap > > The me [ more ] [ reply ] Security Configuration Settings? 2004-09-21 El C0chin0 (mr nasty ix netcom com) (5 replies) Im in the process of trying to secure a SunOS name 5.8 Generic_108528-29 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R, using settings per http://sabernet.home.comcast.net/papers/Solaris.html. I have a few questions about the settings and due to the fact that this box is supposed to look as much like a producti [ more ] [ reply ] Re: Security Configuration Settings? 2004-09-23 Kapetanakis Giannis (bilias edu physics uoc gr) (1 replies) RE: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-20 Myers, Mike (Mike Myers nwdc net) Re: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-15 Jas Amidzic (jasmin amidzic abs gov au) RE: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-14 Myers, Mike (Mike Myers nwdc net) (1 replies) We have been looking at a similar project except that it needs to be cross platform (Solaris and HP-UX). We found some limitations in the SEAM product (and to be honest, HP's product as well) in that if the user was in too many Windows group the PAC (Privilege Access Certificate?) which gets tagged [ more ] [ reply ] RE: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-17 Ted Rodriguez-Bell (tedrb WellsFargo COM) RE: allowing ordinary users to open privileged ports 2004-09-14 Myers, Mike (Mike Myers nwdc net) You know, I've often heard this statement (about SUID shell scripts being dangerous) without a good explanation -- too often the authoring citing "security concerns" for not explaining it (not that Brian did!) For those who feel the same way, I found a reasonable explanation here: http://www.faqs. [ more ] [ reply ] Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-12 Ron Ogle (ogler tce com) (2 replies) Has anyone out there been very successful with completely integrating Solaris 9 into Microsoft's Active Directory? This is what I'm hoping to do: 1. Use Kerberos on Solaris 9 via PAM to authenticate to AD using the Windows username/password. 2. Use LDAP through NSS to get /etc/passwd and /etc/gr [ more ] [ reply ] Re: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-15 Reg Quinton (reggers ist uwaterloo ca) Re: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-14 Erwin Fritz (efritz GLJA com) (1 replies) Re: Solaris 9 authentication and access control into Active Directory 2004-09-15 Kai Howells (kai rocketcat info) allowing ordinary users to open privileged ports 2004-09-11 randy calma repasa (rrepasa ekonek com) (4 replies) I would like to thank everyone who have shared their suggestions, experiences, document links, etc... to my problem at hand. Please allow me to summarize: 1. Use ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_smallest_nonpriv_port [ < 1024 ]. Ndd however, does not allow the value to be below 1024 (whether from runlevel [ more ] [ reply ] Re: allowing ordinary users to open privileged ports 2004-09-14 Crist J. Clark (cristjc comcast net) Re: allowing ordinary users to open privileged ports 2004-09-12 Herman Sheremetyev (herman swebpage com) Re: allowing ordinary users to open privileged ports 2004-09-13 Brian Parent (bparent calvin ucsd edu) |
|
Privacy Statement |
information.
For various reasons, primarily that the LDAP server needs to access the LDAP
repository, we are running one of our domains with OpenLDAP (the other domain
where we have a dedicated server runs iDS5 with no p
[ more ] [ reply ]