Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
      Digg this story   Add to del.icio.us   (page 3 of 3 ) previous 
Security still underfunded
Kelly Martin, 2005-08-03

Story continued from Page 2


The largest computer companies like Cisco, Oracle, Google, Symantec and Microsoft should try a little harder to proactively hire smart, independent security people, protect themselves, and then use the assimilated brainpower to develop products and services that earn enormous sums of money for their organization. Google and Microsoft are already well-known for doing this, but there's still room for much more. Particularly those people who can demonstrate that they have strong ethics and morals should be on that list. Still don't see the threat?

The Cisco routers that hold up your company's infrastructure may already be under someone else's control. A generation four Windows rootkit could lead to a pot of gold -- and might remain undetected for years. Rest assured that all those unpatched Oracle hacks could lead to another ten pots of gold, among the jewels of your enterprise's database. A Symantec security gateway turned into its evil twin could really hurt detection efforts, and give you a false sense of security to boot. Even after a stealthy intrusion is one day discovered, and the FBI or Interpol are brought in, the very forensic tools they use can be turned against them, with an electronic time bomb that explodes when specific forensic tools are used. There is no safe haven in the security world, only risk mitigation and one's hope for the best.

The brain-drain

I enjoy reading people complain about brain-drain, as if we all work for some altruistic reason that is completely absent from any financial gain. Get with it, this is business. Double my salary and offer me a position higher up in your organization, and I'd be the first one to leave. It's not brain-drain, it's common sense.

Of course, this is all oversimplified, and no one in the security industry wants to focus on the simple things. We all enjoy the fact that security is growing evermore complex; it drives us to do what we do, and it pays the bills. But the financial incentives on both sides of the fence is growing, and the payouts are increasingly great. Companies need to spend more money on security, protecting those billions in profits using the greatest resource that is available: hiring smart people. Without them, all those expensive security products will go to waste.


Kelly Martin has been working with networks and security since 1986, and he's editor for SecurityFocus, Symantec's online magazine.
    Digg this story   Add to del.icio.us   (page 3 of 3 ) previous 
Comments Mode:
Rooting the Fortune 100 2005-08-04
Anonymous
Security still underfunded 2005-08-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Security still underfunded 2005-08-09
Anonymous
Security still underfunded 2005-08-04
Don Parker (1 replies)
Re: Security still underfunded 2005-08-05
Alexey Vesnin
Security still underfunded 2005-08-05
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Re: Security still underfunded 2005-08-11
SctySpc
Security still underfunded 2005-08-09
Trustifier
Security still underfunded 2005-08-09
NDA_Compromised
Security still underfunded 2005-08-11
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus