Digg this story   Add to del.icio.us   (page 1 of 3 ) next 
Forensic felonies
Mark Rasch, 2006-04-24

A new law in Georgia on private investigators now extends to computer forensics and computer incident response, meaning that forensics experts who testify in court without a PI license may be committing a felony.

In the U.S. television show "Medium," Patricia Arquette's character uses her "special psychic skills" to help solve crimes. If a new law passed by the Georgia legislature but not yet signed by the Governor goes into effect, not only could Miss Arquette's character face legal troubles, but thousands of computer security consultants would face the very real threat of jail time - simply for plying their trade.

The Georgia law, HB 1259 at first seems innocuous enough. It requires all private investigators in the State of Georgia to be licensed. It is intended to prevent people from simply opening up shop and claiming to be PIs. It requires such PIs to pass an exam, be in business for a particular period of time, be self-regulated, and so on. The problem lies in both the definition and interpretation of what services can only be offered by a licensed PI, and how that extends into the electronic world.

According to the legislature, a Private Investigator is any person who is in the business of obtaining or furnishing, or accepting employment to obtain or to furnish, information with reference to:

(A) Crimes or wrongs done or threatened against the United States of America or any state or territory thereof;

(B) The background, identity, habits, conduct, business, employment, occupation, assets, honesty, integrity, credibility, knowledge, trustworthiness, efficiency, loyalty, activity, movement, whereabouts, affiliations, associations, transactions, acts, reputation, or character of any person;

(C) The location, disposition, or recovery of lost or stolen property;

(D) The cause or responsibility for fires, libels, losses, accidents, damage, or injury to persons or property;

(E) The securing of evidence in the course of the private detective business to be used before any court, board, officer, or investigating committee; or

(F) The protection of individuals from serious bodily harm or death.

In addition to the aforementioned services, "private detective business"" shall also mean providing, or accepting employment to provide, protection of persons from death or serious bodily harm."

Typical "Magnum PI" kind of stuff. The problem is that the statute is written so broadly as to include almost all types of computer forensics and computer incident response – at least when done by outside consultants. After all, when do you need computer forensics, or incident response? Typically, you call in a computer forensics expert when you suspect something "bad" has happened. Thus, you retain the expert to furnish information with respect to possible crimes or wrongs (the phrase against the United States or any State or territory doesn't mean that the State is the victim of the crime, just that it violates the state law.)

You also retain forensic experts to collect evidence about damages and loss to you – from computer viruses, worms, attacks, and so on. You want to know what happened, how it happened, why it happened, and how to prevent it from happening again. You want to know the, "cause and responsibility for ... losses and damage to ... property." Namely, this applies to your computer network and the information contained in it. You also want the information collected in a way so that it can be used in court or by other investigators later on, even if you do not intend to pursue a civil or criminal case. If information is stolen, you want to know the "location, disposition and [ensure the] recovery of lost or stolen property" namely the intellectual property stored on the computer. For all of these things, you would typically hire not a gumshoe, but a forensic expert. Unfortunately, under this new law that forensic expert would be committing a felony.

Forensic expert prosecuted and sued

The Georgia statute was brought to my attention by Scott Moulton. Frequent readers of this space may remember Scott as the person who was criminally prosecuted and civilly sued in Georgia for doing a port scan on a computer system prior to allowing that system to connect to the system he was managing. I wrote a column about it at the time.

Story continued on Page 2 



Mark D. Rasch is an attorney and technology expert in the areas of intellectual property protection, computer security, privacy and regulatory compliance. He formerly worked at the Department of Justice, where he was responsible for the prosecution of Robert Morris, the Cornell University graduate student responsible for the so-called Morris Worm and the investigations of the Hannover hackers featured in Clifford Stoll’s book, "The Cuckoo’s Egg."
    Digg this story   Add to del.icio.us   (page 1 of 3 ) next 
Comments Mode:
Forensic felonies 2006-04-24
Anonymous
Forensic felonies 2006-04-25
ITDefPat (1 replies)
Re: Forensic felonies 2006-05-02
Craig S Wright
Forensic felonies 2006-04-25
Tim Oman (2 replies)
Re: Forensic felonies 2006-04-25
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: Re: Forensic felonies 2006-05-02
Craig S Wright (1 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Forensic felonies 2006-05-12
Kelly Martin
Re: Forensic felonies 2006-05-15
DoktorThomas
See also: 2006-04-25
ChrisH
Forensic felonies 2006-04-25
wpn
Forensic felonies 2006-04-25
Anonymous
PI Qualifications 2006-04-26
John Foster (2 replies)
Re: PI Qualifications 2006-05-15
Ted Wallerstedt
Re: PI Qualifications 2006-06-15
Anonymous
Forensic felonies 2006-04-27
Anonymous
Forensic felonies 2006-04-27
Jay C. James (1 replies)
Re: Forensic felonies 2006-05-08
Mark Rasch
Forensic felonies 2006-05-09
Anonymous
Georgia Blinkes 2006-05-10
Mark D. Rasch
Forensic felonies 2006-05-15
DoktorThomas


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus