Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2005-02-09

In the first case of its kind, a California video game maker is suing an entire community of software tinkerers for reverse engineering and modifying Xbox games that they legally purchased.

Comments Mode:
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Doug Sibley (15 replies)
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Mark A. (1 replies)
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
crippled ninja
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous
moral rights, not in the USA 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Clint
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Silverfish
Moral Rights indeed. 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-12
GXCori
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-15
Anonymous (2 replies)
Reality of moral rights 2005-02-16
Anonymous
Re: Theory of moral rights 2006-03-09
Doug Sibley
Re: Theory of moral rights 2006-03-22
Anonymous
Re: B. S. 2009-06-15
Anonymous
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Anonymous (3 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-11
Arawn
You don't "own" the software, but you own the media it comes in. And you choose how to use it, for your personal use only, as long it isn't prejudicial to the licensing entity (the producer). Now, before you think I'm on the company side, read on.

Let's look at this issue imparcially:

- The user has the right to use the software as he pleases, as long it's for his personal use. That includes modding, in my view. He can even burn the media, or use it for target practice, as a previous poster mentioned. It's the user's prerrogative.

- Now, the company can consider that some modding can be prejudicial to company image, like associating nudity or any offensive image, to its products. In that case, the company can decide it can take legal action.

But in this case, the game could already be considered controversial, and if I remember right, it was when one of these games was launched, so that last point doesn't apply and it has no case.

Looking in other perspective, the company is shunning its user base. It is attacking its customers. That's a stupid move.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/10466/30544#30544
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Former Ninjahacker member
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Alterac (Alterac (at) McDonaldConsulting (dot) com [email concealed]) (2 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-18
D'Glenn (dglenn (at) radix (dot) net [email concealed])
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Rich (2 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-14
Michael (at) UltraPresence (dot) net [email concealed]
In other news... 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
In other news... 2005-02-11
Kylratix
lets list some current games: 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
lets list some current games: 2005-02-14
Christ, Jesus H.
Nipples = lawsuit 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-11
Tanis (1 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-18
D'Glenn (dglenn (at) radix (dot) net [email concealed])
Boycott 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Where is the outrage?! 2005-02-14
Pimpdad
Tecmo - you just lost a paying customer! 2005-02-14
Ex-Tecmo PAYING Customer!!!!!
Lawsuit Heaven 2005-02-15
Orcusb
Legal situation in Germany 2005-02-16
Anonymous
We can help 2005-02-16
Larry
This is going too far!!! 2005-02-16
aaron.shuford (at) wku (dot) edu [email concealed]







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus