Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2005-02-09

In the first case of its kind, a California video game maker is suing an entire community of software tinkerers for reverse engineering and modifying Xbox games that they legally purchased.

Comments Mode:
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Doug Sibley (14 replies)
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Mark A. (1 replies)
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
crippled ninja
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-10
Anonymous
moral rights, not in the USA 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Clint
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Silverfish
Moral Rights indeed. 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-12
GXCori
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Theory of moral rights 2005-02-15
Anonymous (2 replies)
Reality of moral rights 2005-02-16
Anonymous
Re: Theory of moral rights 2006-03-09
Doug Sibley
Re: Theory of moral rights 2006-03-22
Anonymous
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Former Ninjahacker member
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Alterac (Alterac (at) McDonaldConsulting (dot) com [email concealed]) (2 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-18
D'Glenn (dglenn (at) radix (dot) net [email concealed])
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-10
Rich (2 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-14
Michael (at) UltraPresence (dot) net [email concealed]
Don't go ripping your after-market spoilers off yours cars, stripping paint, etc. The problem here is not the law. The law is setup so that a company can producing a piece of software that they want to only be represented in it's intended way. So that it cannot be modded, and that defiantly should be allowed. If I create a piece of software, and sell it under the condition that you can't mod it, then you should not be able to mod it.

The real question here is why the hell a gameing company would go against it's customers like this. A company should never treat it's own customers as "hackers." I'll tell you one thing, if I had children, I wouldn't let them play a game that everyone talks about the 'hackers' playing.

The law is setup so that the company can go after people like this, the venue they are taking is that the 'hackers' were defacing the integrity of the game by supporting nude characters.

I don't know why they wouldn't have just e-mailed the website owners and asked them to stop supporting sexually explicit content.

Just seems like a really stuiped move on the gaming companies side. Cator to the customers, don't fight them. The customer is ALWAYS right. - Simple rules of business that I was taught when I was just a child.

Why don't they just buy the site from the people and charge for the mods? They could have their programmers develop 4 or 5 of them and sell them for $20 a piece.

Lets see CBA...

Action: Sue Customers

Cost: Potentially a bunch of customers. A potential community of gamers revolving around their game.

Benifit: ????

Action: Buy mod site(s)

Cost: $25k? (less than legal fees)

Benifit: $millions (sell the dammed mods, don't make them pricy...let the customers distribute their own custom mods, but have the game programmers work on a few really advanced ones. Help to setup/develop a community of people working toghet with these mods and stuff. Smart customers are the best type of customer. Not to mention when someone works with a single company for a long time and enjoys their time working with that company (be it a gaming site) they tend to be eager to try new products/services provided by that company

Simple marketing stuff...Maybe they should fire a few of those hot shot lawyers and hire a marketing analysist (or two).

Just my $.02

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/10466/30589#30589
In other news... 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
In other news... 2005-02-11
Kylratix
lets list some current games: 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
lets list some current games: 2005-02-14
Christ, Jesus H.
Nipples = lawsuit 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-11
Tanis (1 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Hackers sued for tinkering with Xbox games 2005-02-18
D'Glenn (dglenn (at) radix (dot) net [email concealed])
Boycott 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Where is the outrage?! 2005-02-14
Pimpdad
Tecmo - you just lost a paying customer! 2005-02-14
Ex-Tecmo PAYING Customer!!!!!
Lawsuit Heaven 2005-02-15
Orcusb
Legal situation in Germany 2005-02-16
Anonymous
We can help 2005-02-16
Larry
This is going too far!!! 2005-02-16
aaron.shuford (at) wku (dot) edu [email concealed]







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus