, SecurityFocus 2005-03-04
Two companies that make digital systems for nuclear power plants have come out against a government proposal that would attach cyber security standards to plant safety systems.
Expand all |
Post comment

"...It also urges vendors to add additional security to their software development process, as a bulwark against saboteurs writing backdoors into the code, or implanting logic bombs programmed to shut down a safety system at a particular time. But securing the software from its own developers "would not be practical to implement," according to comments filed by Virginia-based energy company Dominion, one of two plant operators who chimed in on the proposal. "Access of the programmer to the software is a matter of trust."
Why is this not practical to implement?
Wouldn't open-source software with peer review and a mandatory third-party audit protect against possible developer sabotage?
Isn't that one of the major strenths of open source software??
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/10618/30871#30871