, The Register 2005-03-15
Banks are spending millions on two-factor authentication for their customers but the approach no longer provides adequate protection against fraud or identity theft, according to Bruce Schneier, the encryption guru.
Expand all |
Post comment
I'd hardly call even a temporary drop in fraud "wasting millions"
2005-03-15
Bruce K. Marshall (3 replies)
Bruce K. Marshall (3 replies)
I'd hardly call even a temporary drop in fraud "wasting millions"
2005-03-15
bwatson_at_nettracers.com
bwatson_at_nettracers.com

However, even with two-factor authentication it is possible to piggyback through a trojan or something of that nature. However, that does not make it useless. It would then requrie that person to actively be watching for this connection to occur and take advantage of it while the session was still valid -- assuming this did not cause some sort of intrusion detection as a result of multiple simultaneous requests. I mean two-factor authentication is also useless if someone has a gun to my head and is forcing me to login for them.. so what?
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/10694/30961#30961