, SecurityFocus 2005-11-29
When the SANS Institute, a computer-security training organization, released its Top-20 vulnerabilities last week, the rankings continued an annual ritual aimed at highlighting the worst flaws for network administrators. This year, the list had something different, however: The group flagged the collective vulnerabilities in Apple Computer's Mac OS X operating system as a major threat.
Expand all |
Post comment
Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-29
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Re: Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-30
Matthew Murphy (1 replies)
Matthew Murphy (1 replies)
Re: Re: Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X security under scrutiny
2005-11-30
Jeffsters (1 replies)
Jeffsters (1 replies)

OS X's security model is actually fairly *INSECURE*. Its user seperation is even worse than that of Windows, because OS X has repeated the Windows mistake of having graphical applications running as a superuser on the same desktop as unprivileged, untrusted code.
"Security is not only vira and trojans but also Understanding how to use your firewall. Not working on your admin account then on the internet and using secure password that can´t be broken easily with programs like mac the ripper. This might be obvious for you but not for people like my dad."
The virus total for OS X is only low because of the product's obscurity. What's really funny is to hear OS X zealots say "ZERO VIRUSES", blah blah blah. The problem with OS X is that its users believe their OS to be secure simply because it isn't vulnerable to the same threats that Windows is.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/11359/32819#32819