Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties

Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties
Robert Lemos, SecurityFocus 2006-04-05

Vancouver, CANADA--Vulnerability researchers, software makers, and security companies that buy information about software flaws found little common ground during a panel discussion on Wednesday debating the merits of vulnerability-purchasing programs.

Expand all | Post comment

Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-06
KF (1 replies)

Re: Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-06
Tom Ferris

Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-07
Matthew Murphy

Minor clerical issue. The wording that reads "cuffed and..." should have a period in place of 'and'. The following word is merely for emphasis.

And yes... dealing with third-parties is certainly a safer revenue source than going to vendors asking for money for vulnerability reporting... :-)

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/11386/33601#33601

Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-07
TJ (2 replies)

Re: Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-07
Anonymous

Re: Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-08
Matthew Murphy

Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-10
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Groups argue over merits of flaw bounties 2006-04-10
Anonymous