, SecurityFocus 2006-05-17
Israeli anti-spam startup Blue Security decided on Tuesday to shutter its aggressive anti-spam service, citing threats of further--and more malicious--attacks on its service and users.
Expand all |
Post comment
Blue Security folds under spammer's wrath
2006-05-18
Anonymous (7 replies)
Anonymous (7 replies)
Re: Blue Security folds under spammer's wrath
2006-05-19
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Blue Security folds under spammer's wrath
2006-05-19
FixitDave (3 replies)
FixitDave (3 replies)
Blue Security folds under spammer's wrath
2006-05-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Blue Security folds under spammer's wrath
2006-05-28
A random computer geek (1 replies)
A random computer geek (1 replies)
securityfocus cowards hide the truth
2006-06-05
bluesecurity IS spamming (2 replies)
bluesecurity IS spamming (2 replies)

So why the heck don't we just have dinky 20 Gigabyte hard drives floating around every ISP, prefilled with Last Known Lookups for every IP address on Earth? Sure -- I know some are dynamic and you have to look them up every time, but that special feature should only be the worry of those willing to take the risk to use it. I think the average business would sooner accept not being able to effortlessly shift between servers every five seconds than accept sharing ten percent of their take with the Russian Mafia.
Updating the IP addresses, if not done by target servers, could still be done by some TOR-like anonymous process, with the IP address holders using public keys to ensure control over their blocks. Spammers could send crap into some node on the network, but if the public keys don't match up it wouldn't go any further, and anyone could access any node.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/11392/34675#34675