, SecurityFocus 2007-04-30
UPDATE - Following a two-and-a-half year investigation, federal prosecutors charged online payment service E-Gold, its parent company Gold & Silver Reserve, and its three owners with four counts of violating the U.S. laws restricting funds transfers and money laundering, according to an indictment unsealed on Friday.
Expand all |
Post comment
E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-04-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Matthew Murphy (1 replies)
Matthew Murphy (1 replies)
E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-02
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Matthew Murphy (3 replies)
Matthew Murphy (3 replies)
Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-02
Matthew Murphy (2 replies)
Matthew Murphy (2 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-03
Matthew Murphy (4 replies)
Matthew Murphy (4 replies)
Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: E-Gold charged with money laundering
2007-05-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
E-Gold charged with money laundering... help
2007-05-09
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)

eGold's founders knew that, which is why they lied about the physical location of their assets. The facts are also every bit as clear that eGold knew or had reason to believe that dozens of accounts were used for criminal activity and did next-to-nothing to reign in criminal activity.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/11462/34506#34506