Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Worries over "good worms" rise again
Robert Lemos, SecurityFocus 2008-02-18

A scientific paper discussing theories of information propagation reopened the debate on beneficial worms last week, after one of the authors -- a researcher at Microsoft -- told reporters that the company could benefit from making software updates spread more like computer worms.

Comments Mode:
Worries over "good worms" rise again 2008-02-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
"White Worms" I wish they would stay DEAD! 2008-02-19
Nicholas Weaver
Worries over "good worms" rise again 2008-02-19
assurbanipal
Missing the all important fact. 2008-02-19
oiaohm
Damaged in transport. Good Worm turns bad due to damage. How would you prove it was intentional or just bad ram or bad harddrive or something bad network.

This is basically building something virus writers to turn against the network and walk way leaving no evidence that can be simple used in court.

Note some worms even killed them selfs out due to a fluke damage. The reverse could just as simple happen. If it has the means to self replicate it can be harmful.

Nothing can perfectly protect against this happening. Now system admin scanning all clients connected from a controlled server could do close to the same thing but with risk controlled.

The replication bit is completely risky.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/11506/34989#34989







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus