, SecurityFocus 2000-12-18
Federal court finds that scanning a network doesn't cause damage, or threaten public health and safety.
Expand all |
Post comment
Lame
2000-12-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lame (a reply by VC3)
2000-12-20
david.dunn (at) vc3 (dot) com [email concealed] (2 replies)
david.dunn (at) vc3 (dot) com [email concealed] (2 replies)
Your headline is misleading
2000-12-19
EJ (4 replies)
EJ (4 replies)
re: Your headline is misleading
2000-12-19
ThwartedEfforts (2 replies)
ThwartedEfforts (2 replies)
Your headline is misleading
2000-12-19
merk_man (1 replies)
merk_man (1 replies)
So if some one knocks on my door...
2000-12-19
garak (at) fastvcd (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)
garak (at) fastvcd (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)

Making port scanning illegal based on the assumption that the person doing it may or may not have ill gotten intentions is ludicrous. Purpose should not be guessed at, or punished based on belief on intentions. That is equivalent to suing a person for intent to break into a car because they have a coat hanger with them. Until the actual event occurs, nothing illegal has taken place.
If someone is serious about hacking into a system, they will do a lot more than just a simple port scan. They should be punished for an actual breech, not something so basic as a ping.
Port Scanning itself does have a viable business use. Data Security Analyst use that among many other methods of integrity testing. Making it illegal would make their jobs harder, and hackers will ill gotten intentions jobs a lot easier. As the saying goes: "If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns".
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/126/4078#4078