Port scans legal, judge says

Port scans legal, judge says
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2000-12-18

Federal court finds that scanning a network doesn't cause damage, or threaten public health and safety.

Expand all | Post comment

Lame 2000-12-19
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lame (a reply by VC3) 2000-12-20
david.dunn (at) vc3 (dot) com [email concealed] (2 replies)

Extra Lame 2000-12-20
anonymous (1 replies)

Extra Lame (Another reply from VC3) 2000-12-21
david.dunn (at) vc3 (dot) com [email concealed]

Lame (a reply by VC3) 2000-12-21
Dazed and Confused (1 replies)

Lame (a reply by VC3) 2000-12-21
david.dunn (at) vc3 (dot) com [email concealed]

Get a grip 2000-12-19
Chip

Good for him. 2000-12-19

Your headline is misleading 2000-12-19
EJ (4 replies)

Your headline is misleading 2007-03-09
Sady.Org

Re: Your headline is misleading 2007-03-09
Sady.Org

re: Your headline is misleading 2000-12-19
ThwartedEfforts (2 replies)

re: Your headline is misleading 2000-12-19
Sleeper (1 replies)

re: Your headline is misleading 2000-12-22
brm

re: Your headline is misleading 2000-12-20
Anonymouse (1 replies)

Re: re: Your headline is misleading 2006-07-27
Anonymous

Your headline is misleading 2000-12-19
merk_man (1 replies)

Your headline is misleading 2000-12-19
Ray L (4 replies)

Good guy getting blamed... 2000-12-19
anon-coward

Legality based on Assumtion 2000-12-19
Tiff

Your headline is misleading 2000-12-20
Giezr

Your headline is misleading 2000-12-22
brm

judges decision 2000-12-19
jeff_schmitz (at) enron (dot) net [email concealed]

So if some one knocks on my door... 2000-12-19
garak (at) fastvcd (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)

So if some one knocks on my door... 2000-12-20
Giezr

Just don't do it. 2000-12-19
Anonymous Coward (1 replies)

Just don't do it. 2000-12-19
iNDiGO

Port Scan 2000-12-19
Bear

A hacker is not a hacker he's a security consultant if he works for you. 2000-12-20
merchant

Interesting 2000-12-20
mickey

American Justice System 2000-12-20
b00tl3g

VC3 is Full of Crap! 2000-12-20
JamesF, web developer

Things not mentioned in the article 2000-12-20
A Fly on the Wall

Ringing a Doorbell or Checking for an Open Window? 2000-12-20
apersonwhosees thisalot

Port scan for port 80? Not so bad I guess, and if I was in IT security I would not be that concerned with it. A port scan for port 27374 however? (subSeven Trojan) It seems that that person was not trying to find a service, but an expliot. I am wondering if the judge ruled on intent, rather than the port scan itself.

I think the headline of this article is misleading.

Illegal or not, if you do not investigate these attempts and report them to the ISP responsible these people will find an exploit eventually.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/126/4091#4091

VC3 2000-12-20
Matthew F. Caldwell, CISSP <mattc (at) guarded (dot) net [email concealed]>

Wrong 2000-12-20
William Black (1 replies)

Wrong 2000-12-20
aardwolfe (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]

Scanning illegal? 2000-12-20
vcloud

Doing his job. 2000-12-20
Bob C

Mistakes 2000-12-21
djmad (1 replies)

Mistakes .... 2000-12-22
cert (at) fvsh (dot) de [email concealed]

Intent is really the issue 2000-12-21
Scott Craig <scraig@MIfortune500(fake).com>

Clarifications 2000-12-21
JAG (Just Another Geek)