Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Spam war gags Gilmore
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2001-03-15

Verio cuts off EFF co-founder John Gilmore over open mail server.

Comments Mode:
Spam, or not... 2001-03-15
dirge (2 replies)
Spam, or not... 2001-03-16
Kidd Kasper
Spam, or not... 2001-03-16
Someone Who Writes Mail Servers For A Living
How hard IS THIS REALLY? 2001-03-16
xrayspx
Wake up 2001-03-16
Al Huger (1 replies)
Wake up 2001-03-20
Rob Hughes
ISP's should be emulating the telcos that came before them. 2001-03-16
someone247356_AT_yahoo.com (2 replies)
Re: ISP's should be emulating the telcos that came before them. 2001-03-17
op
ISP's should be emulating the telcos that came before them. 2001-03-17
NoSpammer (1 replies)
ISP's should be emulating the telcos that came before them. 2001-03-19
someone247356_AT_yahoo.com (2 replies)
ISP's should be emulating the telcos that came before them. 2001-03-19
Alun Jones
ISP's should be emulating the telcos that came before them. 2001-03-19
someonesomewhere
Spam 2001-03-16
Concerned Patron
Users are the problem, so are software designers that don't understand that 2001-03-16
Tirade
People who don't want spam should filter it out themselves 2001-03-16
slymir (2 replies)
People who don't want spam should filter it out themselves 2001-03-18
Bungie
People who don't want spam should filter it out themselves 2001-03-19
Alun Jones
John has a good point: 2001-03-16
A non-delusional Spam-hater (3 replies)
John has a good point: 2001-03-17
Steve Cohen
You say - "let's not forget who's responsible - the spammer".

Fine, show me a way to punish him alone and I'll agree with your position.

Until then, I say the ISPs do have a right to filter out open-relay servers. And the censorship/1st Amendment analogy does not hold here. This is not based on the content of the message, only its method of transmission. If the source can't playing by the rules, they can build their own network.

If the spammer cannot be stopped, then the spam-enabler should expect to feel the brunt of the backlash.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/173/4986#4986
John has a good point: 2001-03-18
Stephen J. Friedl
John has a good point: 2001-03-19
Alun Jones
ISPs are doing what the majority want 2001-03-16
someonesomewhere (1 replies)
RE:ISPs are doing what the majority want 2001-03-19
someone247356_AT_yahoo.com (2 replies)
RE:ISPs are doing what the majority want 2001-03-19
someonesomewhere
RE:ISPs are doing what the majority want 2001-03-19
Alun Jones
Search for a better solition 2001-03-17
Gerrie (1 replies)
Search for a better solition 2001-03-19
Alun Jones
open relay irresponsible 2001-03-18
bob niederman
Spam is wrong & open relays don't help BUT...! 2001-03-19
0160 Founder of The Foundation for Peace and Opportunity Seekers since 1987 & Admin of Small ISP in California USA (2 replies)
Spam is wrong & open relays don't help BUT...! 2001-03-19
someonesomewhere
Spam is wrong & open relays don't help BUT...! 2001-03-19
Alun Jones
Foolish thing for an ISP to do 2001-03-20
Net Citizen (1 replies)
Foolish thing for an ISP to do 2001-03-22
Alun Jones <alun (at) texis (dot) com [email concealed]>
Good! Yet another open relay closed! 2001-03-21
Jeroen Wijnands
What the heck does rights and freedoms have to do with this? 2001-03-21
someonesomewhere







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus