, SecurityFocus 2000-04-17
Is Open Source really more secure than closed? Elias Levy says there's a little security in obscurity.
Expand all |
Post comment
Netscape developers are weenies!
2000-04-17
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Bug *fixes*...?
2000-04-17
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Examine the record...
2000-04-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Comparing Apache and IIS is wrong
2000-04-17
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
You've made several critical mistakes in your comment.
2000-04-17
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]> (3 replies)
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]> (3 replies)
Sorry about the bad formatting.
2000-04-17
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]>
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]>
Re: Bruce Parens' Defense of Open Source
2000-04-17
David Terrell <dbt (at) meat (dot) net [email concealed]> (2 replies)
David Terrell <dbt (at) meat (dot) net [email concealed]> (2 replies)
How to respond to past reports of vulnerability
2000-04-17
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Re: How to respond to past reports of vulnerability
2000-04-18
David Terrell <dbt (at) meat (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
David Terrell <dbt (at) meat (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
I don't think you get what he's talking about, Dave...
2000-04-19
Barry Fitzgerald <reaperx1 (at) netscape (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Barry Fitzgerald <reaperx1 (at) netscape (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Thanks for the additional info but...
2000-04-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Trust-worthyness and ability to spot bugs
2000-04-17
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]>
Bruce Perens <bruce (at) perens (dot) com [email concealed]>
Skill is always at a premium
2000-04-17
Christopher Petrilli <petrilli (at) amber (dot) org [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Christopher Petrilli <petrilli (at) amber (dot) org [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Who found the sendmail bug?
2000-04-17
Brett <disfunct (at) radiusnet (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Brett <disfunct (at) radiusnet (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Morris didn't find the Sendmail bug
2000-04-20
Rick Smith <rick_smith (at) securecomputing (dot) com [email concealed]>
Rick Smith <rick_smith (at) securecomputing (dot) com [email concealed]>
to expand on what i said earlier.
2000-04-17
Brett <disfunct (at) radiusnet (dot) net [email concealed]>
Brett <disfunct (at) radiusnet (dot) net [email concealed]>
So what you're saying is that open source software is often as insecure as closed-source software is most of the time.
2000-04-18
Anonymous
Anonymous
Correct the facts and the conclusions stand strong
2000-04-21
Rick Smith <rick_smith (at) securecomputing (dot) com [email concealed]>
Rick Smith <rick_smith (at) securecomputing (dot) com [email concealed]>
Original Bugtraq mailing list description?
2000-04-21
Robert Quinn <rquinn (at) pobox (dot) com [email concealed]>
Robert Quinn <rquinn (at) pobox (dot) com [email concealed]>
Yes and no. Open Source enables public scrutiny. But it doesn't demand or imply it. There's plenty of Linux software out there that could use a good security audit, but it's not being done. And as long as audits are only potentially possible, and not happening, then security is also only potential.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/19/1453#1453