, special to SecurityFocus 2001-04-30
Ten thousand attendees, 250 vendor booths, and, still, something was missing.
Expand all |
Post comment
RSA Conference 2K++ was pretty bad
2001-04-30
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]>
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]>
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-04-30
Charles Hutson (4 replies)
Charles Hutson (4 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
Charles Hutson (3 replies)
Charles Hutson (3 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
Charles Hutson (1 replies)
Charles Hutson (1 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-03
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)

On the more devious side, it would have been a no brainer for us to have purchased one pass and then performed some creative photocopying to recreate a pass with a new name. Short of bar code scanning and picture ID or a electronic device (which of course drives up the costs) its pretty difficult to stop.
Any inexpensive ideas that don't slow down access too much?
clh
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/199/5493#5493