, special to SecurityFocus 2001-04-30
Ten thousand attendees, 250 vendor booths, and, still, something was missing.
Expand all |
Post comment
RSA Conference 2K++ was pretty bad
2001-04-30
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]>
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]>
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-04-30
Charles Hutson (4 replies)
Charles Hutson (4 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
Charles Hutson (3 replies)
Charles Hutson (3 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-01
Charles Hutson (1 replies)
Charles Hutson (1 replies)
Kevin to the rescue......
2001-05-03
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
ltlw0lf <ltlw0lf (at) home (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)

However I do find myself wondering if securityfocus.com paid Kevin for this mini-article. If so, I would have to question if ethics were considered. It's somewhat like asking Jeffrey Dalmer (sp?) to write a cookbook. We are financially rewarding Kevin for past behaviour which was in violation of the laws of the land.
I think the questionable judgement here would be in any financial incentive that securityfocus.com provided for publication of this article.
-HM
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/199/5533#5533