Endgame for Cybercrime treaty

Endgame for Cybercrime treaty
David Banisar, special to SecurityFocus 2001-06-04

A few feel-good touches can't redeem the COE treaty, or the closed-door process that produced it.

Totally agreed. 2001-06-04
Mat

Problem 2001-06-05
G-14 Classified <g14 (at) sentry (dot) net [email concealed]>

Endgame on cybercrime treaty 2001-06-05
Don M. Darragh

Insanity. 2001-06-06
_clf3_ (1 replies)

How would the ban on development of security evaluation tools go together with GPL and Berkley licenses ? Would they ban OpenBSD because the official release CD contains Nessus, nmap, l0phtcrack, cgichck etc., ? Are telnet/ftp clients security evaluation tools ? Would I go to jail for running ssh ? Is having netcat installed a crime ?

Regards,

_clf3_ PrP_Sc (at) antionline (dot) org [email concealed]

Veneficio, ergo sum.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/213/5839#5839

Useful blog 2006-02-23
Nice site

scanning tools 2001-06-06
root66research (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)

Nice blog 2006-02-23
Useful blog